Always hard to fit into multiple choice. I wouldn't be here if Pentax weren't suitable for the foreseeable future. If my needs were to change, I do presume I could afford the stuff to go with.
And if Pentax weren't making what I needed by then, I don't think I'd be bitter for them having been making what I need *now.*
May never happen, and if I had that kind of budget I might well be just paying a pro lab and working film, instead of a computer company.
I think people lose sight of the fact that even if I had the budget and need for something like a D700 or D1*burp* or EOS 1*burp* ...what I'd be shooting in *these* years from brands that share a lens mount wouldn't have been making me happy.
Most of us who are concerned with these things are and have been toting Pentax for a reason, and likely went out of our way to do so in the first place.
What's to be bitter about? Like we say, merry meet and merry part. Maybe merry meet again.
It's certainly no occasion for Pentax to get complacent or put on airs, of course. I'm really not that interested in them trying to out-Canon Canon or out-Nikon Nikon, though. But I'm here in the first place cause I'm in their 'niche.' I mean, their flash system ain't state of the art, but you know what got my attention? Them still putting a plain old PC terminal on a camera that I could obtain. Sometimes you want the basics, and you want em solid and accurate.
That little PC socket, in a world of gigabytes and nanoseconds and whatsits, showed a bit of consideration. Few things annoy me more than an engineer saying, 'You don't need that!'