Originally posted by johnmflores How about the image quality, Johnny? How does the E-PL1 compare to the K20d? I've got a K20d and have a Panny GH2 on its way to me. I opted for that vs. the K-5 because I need video but am curious about still image quality as well...
thx.
I'll jump in here as I own the K-7 and an E-pl1. The K-7, properly exposed, kills the E-pl1. In raw.
IMHO the E-pl1 kills anything on the market (and certainly the K-7) with even the default jpgs. They are beautiful (iso 200-800).
Edit: In absolute quality though (pixel peeping), APS-C beats micro 4/3. It is all a matter of realistic use of the images - I don't think an 8x10 is going to show much difference.