Today I went hands on with all of the EVILs ; Samsung, Ricoh, Olympus, Panasonic and of course Sony's NEX C3 (did I miss any ?). Ergonomically they all felt better than the Sony TBH - but spec-wise they lag behind. I asked for and received a PK to E adapter ($30 if I want to buy it - I've seen them at half that though) and put on the Zeiss 85/1.4 ... I have to say that peaking is extremely fast, much faster than for the vast majority of us when MFing, though not as fast as using CIF on a Pentax DSLR.
However I hated the almost total lack of controls on the camera itself, and having to dive into the menu to do anything. You are actually holding a lens and not a camera that is virtually just balancing the lens on the rear. I also found myself firing off bursts when I only wanted single shots.
The shutter is a little noisy but it didn't seem as bad in real life as the YouTube videos I've seen.
Overall I'm torn. I think for a lot of people a Kr for roughly the same price (a
little more) would be a better option. However I can see a use and a market for this camera, no question. Adapter - slip on my Leica, Adapter - slip on my Zeiss, Adapter - slip on my Pentax, Adapter - slip on my Canon, or 4/3rds, or Hasselblad or whatever ..... quite incredible actually. You can know choose any lens you want and slip it on the C3.
I'll take a look at the shots and video I took with the C3 tomorrow ! Would I pay for the NEX 7 ( no way - the form factor and UI lose it for me, never mind being the same prive as a K5), would I pay for the much much cheaper C3 - yes I might ......... as an alternative system for all that fine glass out there