Originally posted by jackseh Looking forward to see some blog posts on these!
For compactness, contax g adapter and leica l39 adapter are about the same size if thats what you're after...
Yes, the Contax-G adapter is smaller but the Contax-G lenses almost equal in price to new Voigtlander lenses in Leica M mount.
Originally posted by Laurentiu Cristofor I was cheap - I just got a K tilt adapter and an M42 one
Did you receive the Industar lenses? I am curious how the 110 lenses will work - can they even cover an APS sensor?
LBA virus comes back and get mutated in 5-folds with different adapters. Damn the mirror-less systems with open-source availability of lens mount for easier adoption. I should have gone into a single route with Leica M mount with one single adapter and I will not have the money to spend quickly to get bunch of inexpensive lenses to try.
For the Pentax Auto 110 lens performance, they do better in the M4/3 mount and it appears to match the smaller sensor in M4/3 and that in Pentax Q. I don't see that much vignette in the corners in the link below with pictures taken in Panasonic GH1 that I mention in page 1 of this thread. I quoted below for your research.....
Originally posted by hinman: My two industar pancakes have not come yet. I am hoping the Industar 69 in M39 will work great on my NEX 5N as the adapter for M39 is relatively thin like the Leica M to NEX adapter. Those M39 lens are inexpensive to try and I will report back. The lens and adapters tend to be smaller in the range-finder type of lens as in L39, M39, Contax-G, Olympus Pan-F etc.
Cheers,
Hin
Last edited by hinman; 11-20-2011 at 05:55 PM.