Micro Four Thirds Club

**savoche** · 10-26-2020, 12:59 PM - **4 Likes**

Taken with the kit Pany 12-32. At 12mm, f/5.6, 1/13th.

**UncleVanya** · 10-26-2020, 01:41 PM

Originally posted by edom31

M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm 4-5.6 - E-PM1

That cheeky little thief!

edom31 · 10-26-2020, 03:24 PM

Originally posted by UncleVanya

That cheeky little thief!

Needless to say I just discarded this pumpkin to the garbage... the 3rd in less than the month is done.

Ivan · 10-27-2020, 02:16 AM

Originally posted by edom31

M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm 4-5.6 - E-PM1

You seem to have bought a lens, how are your impressions?

**WPRESTO** · 10-27-2020, 05:40 AM - **1 Like**

Sumac. Pana GX8

edom31 · 10-27-2020, 05:55 AM

Originally posted by Ivan

You seem to have bought a lens, how are your impressions?

Hey Ivan, so, I've taken it out once (I just got it); true kit lense so it is not impressive, but quite capable.

Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL.

I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot.

So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that).

Ivan · 10-27-2020, 08:43 AM

Originally posted by edom31

Hey Ivan, so, I've taken it out once (I just got it); true kit lense so it is not impressive, but quite capable.

Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL.

I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot.

So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that).

For get-togethers ... It might be dark. Advice if possible, use M mode with auto ISO. You can be guaranteed to use the maximum aperture and shutter speed within a reasonable range of 60-120, and even lower. If People will pose for you. Auto modes can have unpredictable results. Or the priority of aperture with a fixed iso, for the maximum that you can agree to. Fully open aperture. I hope I did not offend you with my advice. I would like to see raw files from this lens at different focal lengths. It is really very small and lightweight.

**UncleVanya** · 10-27-2020, 09:14 AM - **1 Like**

Originally posted by edom31

Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL.

LOL - I know what you mean. That lens doesn't inspire confidence in the build but it works fine. I had the Panasonic 35-100 (f4-5.6) and 45-175 f4-5.6 already so the Oly was an easy one to let go.

Originally posted by edom31

I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot.

So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that).

Quick to focus I assume is what you mean? Yes the lens is not slow to focus and it worked well enough. My main concerns:

1) Lack of a hood.
2) Size compared to 35-100
3) Range compared to 45-175
4) Build quality

None of those are deal breakers and I think if you got it for a good price you should just enjoy it. I would add a hood - maybe a nice rubber one if you can find one that size.

Finally - for what you are saying you will use it for I assume these are outdoor situations and you have a lot of distance - the lens should be good for that.

edom31 · 10-27-2020, 09:34 AM - **4 Likes**

Originally posted by Ivan

For get-togethers ... It might be dark. Advice if possible, use M mode with auto ISO. You can be guaranteed to use the maximum aperture and shutter speed within a reasonable range of 60-120, and even lower. If People will pose for you. Auto modes can have unpredictable results. Or the priority of aperture with a fixed iso, for the maximum that you can agree to. Fully open aperture. I hope I did not offend you with my advice. I would like to see raw files from this lens at different focal lengths. It is really very small and lightweight.

Here's a few samples taken today; I went aperture priority to keep if fully open. No offense taken, always open to hear suggestions

It is not bad at all...

PS - I DM'd you re the RAW files

---------- Post added 10-27-20 at 12:36 PM ----------

Originally posted by UncleVanya

Quick to focus I assume is what you mean? Yes the lens is not slow to focus and it worked well enough. My main concerns:1) Lack of a hood.2) Size compared to 35-1003) Range compared to 45-1754) Build qualityNone of those are deal breakers and I think if you got it for a good price you should just enjoy it. I would add a hood - maybe a nice rubber one if you can find one that size.Finally - for what you are saying you will use it for I assume these are outdoor situations and you have a lot of distance - the lens should be good for that.

Quick to focus, yes

I do a lot of outdoor entertaining, so yes, that is the purpose... Also, while a bit long for "group" shots, I'm OK with this, I've never taken anything shorted of 50mm (crop sensor) to a gathering, and I've done well enough.

---------- Post added 10-27-20 at 12:55 PM ----------

I did mention it looks funny with the metal hood I have (OEM hood for my Super-tak 200/4)

**UncleVanya** · 10-27-2020, 10:57 AM - **1 Like**

LOL - I love the hood. There's nothing wrong with using automatic exposure modes and aperture preferred is a good choice.

**WPRESTO** · 10-27-2020, 07:22 PM - **5 Likes**

Although the Pany G9 has really quick AF, at agility meets I still found I got more keepers by prefocusing in MF.

fiveseven · 10-28-2020, 10:32 AM - **5 Likes**

Got fairly inexpensive OM-D (M-10) recently, I had a few of them a while back but sold them, I guess I'm back in M4/3 game again.

Few test pics (somewhat edited) with Helios 44-2

johnmflores · 10-28-2020, 05:05 PM - **3 Likes**

**Wheatridger** · 10-28-2020, 06:15 PM

Originally posted by aaacb

dfa 28-105 adapted on the panasonic g95.

How do you control the aperture?

aaacb · 10-28-2020, 07:13 PM

Originally posted by Wheatridger

How do you control the aperture?

The adapter has a ring that moves the aperture lever. I've seen them called "Pentax DA to MFT" (or another mount), mine's a cheap $20 one and it works well enough for my occasional use. It doesn't give any markings and the throw is about 45 degrees, so it's guesswork how much you stop down.

10-27-2020, 09:34 AM - 4 Likes	#3279
edom31 Pentaxian Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Garden City, NY Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,349	Originally posted by Ivan For get-togethers ... It might be dark. Advice if possible, use M mode with auto ISO. You can be guaranteed to use the maximum aperture and shutter speed within a reasonable range of 60-120, and even lower. If People will pose for you. Auto modes can have unpredictable results. Or the priority of aperture with a fixed iso, for the maximum that you can agree to. Fully open aperture. I hope I did not offend you with my advice. I would like to see raw files from this lens at different focal lengths. It is really very small and lightweight. Here's a few samples taken today; I went aperture priority to keep if fully open. No offense taken, always open to hear suggestions It is not bad at all... PS - I DM'd you re the RAW files ---------- Post added 10-27-20 at 12:36 PM ---------- Originally posted by UncleVanya Quick to focus I assume is what you mean? Yes the lens is not slow to focus and it worked well enough. My main concerns:1) Lack of a hood.2) Size compared to 35-1003) Range compared to 45-1754) Build qualityNone of those are deal breakers and I think if you got it for a good price you should just enjoy it. I would add a hood - maybe a nice rubber one if you can find one that size.Finally - for what you are saying you will use it for I assume these are outdoor situations and you have a lot of distance - the lens should be good for that. Quick to focus, yes I do a lot of outdoor entertaining, so yes, that is the purpose... Also, while a bit long for "group" shots, I'm OK with this, I've never taken anything shorted of 50mm (crop sensor) to a gathering, and I've done well enough. ---------- Post added 10-27-20 at 12:55 PM ---------- I did mention it looks funny with the metal hood I have (OEM hood for my Super-tak 200/4) Last edited by edom31; 10-27-2020 at 09:56 AM.

10-28-2020, 10:32 AM - 5 Likes	#3282
fiveseven Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: NV/CA Posts: 370	Got fairly inexpensive OM-D (M-10) recently, I had a few of them a while back but sold them, I guess I'm back in M4/3 game again. Few test pics (somewhat edited) with Helios 44-2 Last edited by fiveseven; 10-28-2020 at 02:16 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
comparing adapters for Micro Four Thirds (MFT)	rparmar	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	25	08-09-2011 10:01 PM
Kr/Kx or Micro Four Thirds	snowfreak	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	16	07-18-2011 01:12 PM
Leica 25mm f/1.4 for Micro Four Thirds	jct us101	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	3	06-13-2011 05:46 AM
Pentax seriously considering joining Micro Four Thirds?	iht	Pentax News and Rumors	2	04-30-2010 11:49 PM

10-26-2020, 12:59 PM - 4 Likes	#3271
savoche Master of the obvious Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Lowlands of Norway Posts: 18,311	Taken with the kit Pany 12-32. At 12mm, f/5.6, 1/13th.

10-26-2020, 01:41 PM	#3272
UncleVanya Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2014 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 28,401	Originally posted by edom31 M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm 4-5.6 - E-PM1 That cheeky little thief!

10-26-2020, 03:24 PM	#3273
edom31 Pentaxian Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Garden City, NY Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,349	Originally posted by UncleVanya That cheeky little thief! Needless to say I just discarded this pumpkin to the garbage... the 3rd in less than the month is done.

10-27-2020, 02:16 AM	#3274
Ivan Pentaxian Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Moscow Posts: 639	Originally posted by edom31 M.Zuiko Digital 40-150mm 4-5.6 - E-PM1 You seem to have bought a lens, how are your impressions?

10-27-2020, 05:55 AM	#3276
edom31 Pentaxian Join Date: Nov 2017 Location: Garden City, NY Photos: Gallery Posts: 6,349	Originally posted by Ivan You seem to have bought a lens, how are your impressions? Hey Ivan, so, I've taken it out once (I just got it); true kit lense so it is not impressive, but quite capable. Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL. I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot. So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that).

10-27-2020, 08:43 AM	#3277
Ivan Pentaxian Join Date: Dec 2019 Location: Moscow Posts: 639	Originally posted by edom31 Hey Ivan, so, I've taken it out once (I just got it); true kit lense so it is not impressive, but quite capable. Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL. I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot. So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that). For get-togethers ... It might be dark. Advice if possible, use M mode with auto ISO. You can be guaranteed to use the maximum aperture and shutter speed within a reasonable range of 60-120, and even lower. If People will pose for you. Auto modes can have unpredictable results. Or the priority of aperture with a fixed iso, for the maximum that you can agree to. Fully open aperture. I hope I did not offend you with my advice. I would like to see raw files from this lens at different focal lengths. It is really very small and lightweight.

10-27-2020, 09:14 AM - 1 Like	#3278
UncleVanya Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2014 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 28,401	Originally posted by edom31 Out of the box, felt like I was going to crush it with my hands from just grabbing it... true plastic everything! I have a 58mm metal hood, it just unbalances the whole thing... And lets not talk about using it at 150mm with the hood LOL. LOL - I know what you mean. That lens doesn't inspire confidence in the build but it works fine. I had the Panasonic 35-100 (f4-5.6) and 45-175 f4-5.6 already so the Oly was an easy one to let go. Originally posted by edom31 I am pleased with how quick it is in good light, and how much more effective it makes the PEN camera (as it lacks a viewfinder). Shooting in Auto or semi-Auto = that is the reason I wanted the lens. It will be used mostly for family gatherings and such occasions were I want to get some shots but I do not have the time to set up my manual rig. I will try a few artsy shots here and there, but I am not loosing sleep in figuring out the small controls in the camera to set up my every shot. So far, happy with the acquisition. I still need to push the lens a bit more to really get a feel for it; but I much doubt I'll be using it for more than point-and-shoot applications (and I am ok with that). Quick to focus I assume is what you mean? Yes the lens is not slow to focus and it worked well enough. My main concerns: 1) Lack of a hood. 2) Size compared to 35-100 3) Range compared to 45-175 4) Build quality None of those are deal breakers and I think if you got it for a good price you should just enjoy it. I would add a hood - maybe a nice rubber one if you can find one that size. Finally - for what you are saying you will use it for I assume these are outdoor situations and you have a lot of distance - the lens should be good for that.

10-27-2020, 10:57 AM - 1 Like	#3280
UncleVanya Loyal Site Supporter Join Date: Jul 2014 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 28,401	LOL - I love the hood. There's nothing wrong with using automatic exposure modes and aperture preferred is a good choice.

10-28-2020, 05:05 PM - 3 Likes	#3283
johnmflores Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Somerville, NJ Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,361

10-28-2020, 06:15 PM	#3284
Wheatridger Site Supporter Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Colorado Front Range Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 644	Originally posted by aaacb dfa 28-105 adapted on the panasonic g95. How do you control the aperture?

10-28-2020, 07:13 PM	#3285
aaacb Pentaxian Join Date: May 2016 Photos: Gallery Posts: 3,724	Originally posted by Wheatridger How do you control the aperture? The adapter has a ring that moves the aperture lever. I've seen them called "Pentax DA to MFT" (or another mount), mine's a cheap $20 one and it works well enough for my occasional use. It doesn't give any markings and the throw is about 45 degrees, so it's guesswork how much you stop down.