Originally posted by audiobomber Buying a failed product line doesn't make much sense. If Samsung can't sell them, what makes you think Pentax can?
It makes sense insomuch as
a) Ricoh would get an infusion of great and needed tech to use on k-mount cams. Fujitsu's Milbeaut appears to be falling behind the curve, for example. Ricoh's line that they're "not interested in video" for Pentax is, IMHO, largely a marketing decision based on the lag of the Fujitsu processors in video. Samsung could really help here, and I think a k-mount camera with, more or less, the guts of the NX1 (plus IBIS) would be a tremendously successful product. Having the by-all-acounts wonderful 16-50mm F/2-2.8 plus 50-150mm F/2.8 on k-mount also seems to make perfect sense from where I'm standing, as people have been clamoring for SDM-less replacements to the equivalent k-mount lenses.
b) Everyone seems to agree that the NX1 and NX500 are really good cameras, and that their inability to make a large dent in the camera market comes from the perception that Samsung products are cold, tech infused devices with little of the "soul"/cachet that makes a successful camera. Ricoh/Pentax might be able to infuse this cachet into that line-up...
It's a gamble, for sure, but even if Ricoh were to eventually drop the NX line-up if they can't turn it into a market success, I still think they'd come out winners from all the tech they'd get for the k-mount Pentax DSLR line-up...