I like the look of the A6000. Depending on the deals (if any) during Black Friday, I may spring for either an A6000 or an original A7 (not the MkII) myself - in both cases, to use with legacy K-mount and M42 glass, as well as my A-mount lenses (using the LA-EA4 adapter).
The only real downside I see the to the A6000 (and the A7, for that matter), is the compressed RAW images. Alongside my Pentax gear, I shoot with a Sony A99-based Hasselblad HV, and I've taken several shots where I notice compression artefacts at high contrast edges, as well as a lot of noise in recovered shadows (both issues are pretty well documented in various web forums, but I experienced them independently - so don't believe those who say you'll never encounter it in real world shooting; I
have ).
There's not much you can do about the high-contrast edge artefacts, and when it happens, it's usually not readily visible at normal viewing and printing sizes (except, perhaps, with star-trail photographs and the like - then, it can be a real problem). The noisy shadows is another matter entirely... You need to recognise when it may be an issue, and shoot multiple exposures to blend later. Regardless of camera, this usually gives a better result than pulling up shadows or exposure significantly in post-processing, but it's not always an option - especially with moving subjects, for example.