Originally posted by Serkevan So, for almost twice the cost of a K-3 you get a very similarly-performing sensor*.
Right now, you could get a new K-1 and have 300€ to spend on lenses... or you can get the OM-D M1 ii (German prices, new). I'm sorry but it's ridiculous.
My graphic is showing the Oly OM-D E-M1 Mkii, which here in the USA is somewhat cheaper than a Pentax K-1/K-1 II.
The Oly has some great features - amazing (better than Pentax) IBIS, in-camera focus stacking (super neat), pixel shift that creates higher-res files than Pentax. Each camera has its own set of benefits compared with the other.
But if you read the post to which I was responding, I was simply demonstrating that just because the sensor in the Oly is smaller than the Pentax, it is not necessarily inferior.