I think it should not be too surprising. If battery life and OVF is not a concern, MILC makes photography more accessible for a lot of users. Cameras are going back to being a niche thing (YoY downtrend), so it is important for all of us to help and encourage community growth and provide new users help when they need it

.Within my personal friend group (early 20s), I really only know another person that uses a DSLR (Nikon D90), and even then I've been recommending MILC over DSLR for most of my friends. I know one person that switched from a Canon T3i to a Canon M100 as they wanted something more compact, easy taking high quality pictures and photos. I do have one friend that recently went back to their Canon 5D (forgot which mark) after using the A7Rii (they cited ergonomic,battery life, and general usability concerns).
I recently acquired a used Sony A6000 to see what the fuss is about (
not my first mirrorless, I've used the Olympus E-M5, and my primary is the Panasonic G85). I thought people were exaggerating how bad the ergonomics and menus were, but wow, it is bad

. I have used Nikon, Panasonic, Pentax, and Olympus without internally screaming trying to change my settings. That being said (
before I get staked on a pole by a Sony user), it is quite a performer and when it's doing camera duties (taking pictures), it is very painless and enjoyable in that aspect! By KEH's wording, it makes me think where the ex A6000 users are going. Are they staying within the Sony ecosystem, upgrading to a higher tier A6X000 or jumping to A7 series? Maybe they are jumping across the ship to Fujifilm with their discrete dials and nice JPEG engine? Or, maybe they're done with MILC and want to try out a DSLR?