Originally posted by alfdog I do prefer the K5s ergonomics also.
Is the 12mp of the D700 that much of a hindrance compared to the 16mp of the K5?
How do you guys feel about shooting with ISOs higher than 6400 with the D700?
I prefer the 12mp D700 files. Not that the K-5 files are bad in any way... so far I just prefer the look of the D700 files. May be purely subjective, others may feel differently, and my opinion
may change over time. (Of course I'm new to the K-5, and I am sure that I'm not even close to achieving full image quality yet.)
I don't
normally shoot the D700 at anything over 400. I've had it at 3200 once, and the files were fine.