Panasonic GX1

johnmflores · 11-06-2011, 10:08 PM

Originally posted by Aegon

Built-in VF or not, what makes this camera special?

I saw something about sensitivity approaching Sony, which is probably (by my guess) closer to rumor than reality. Otherwise, it looks like other µ43 bodies.

I get consistently clean ISO1600 from my GH2, and have manage clean ISO3200 as well:

If the GX1 uses the G3 sensor, then it will be at the same level as the GH2 and maybe even a half-stop better. Pair that with the excellent 20mm/F1.7, and you have a very good low light camera that fits in your jacket pocket. As good as the K-5? No, but the K-5 won't fit in my pocket, even with the DA40.

Quote:

BTW, I'm uneducated about the Panasonic camera line. I'm really wonder what the fuss is about when from where I sit it looks like an evolution of one of the basic µ43 body types. Does this camera provide wonderful new features or permit different approaches to photography?

Yes, it is an evolution. Many owners of the GF1 have sat on the sidelines as Panasonic has released successors (GF2, GF3) that have veered away from serious amateurs and towards P&S upgraders with each generation. The GX1 is the spiritual successor of the GF1. I'm not as smitten with the rangefinder aesthetic, so I'd probably lean towards the G3 with the EVF and tilt-swivel screen if I was in the market.

Quote:

EDIT: To answer my own question: 43 Rumors | Blog | (FT5) Sources explains why "The GX1 is much better than you think".
Summary:
• sexy looking
• high quality
• better IQ from similar sensor (probably means they cook JPG better than before)

Yea, probably. But some people like haptics and will be influenced by them in their purchase decision. For example, I love the way the K-5 feels in my hand compared to the GH2.

Aegon · 11-06-2011, 10:37 PM

Thanks for the good reply, John.

nickthetasmaniac · 11-06-2011, 10:46 PM

Originally posted by Aegon

I'm really wonder what the fuss is about when from where I sit it looks like an evolution of one of the basic µ43 body types.

As John said, it is an evolution (of the GF1), but it's an evolution that the 'faithful' have been waiting for for quite a while...

Keep in mind that appearances don't make a camera - after all, a Nikon D700 and D300 look near identical on the outside

jogiba · 11-07-2011, 12:52 PM

You Tube

You Tube

Last edited by jogiba; 11-07-2011 at 01:00 PM.

Aegon · 11-07-2011, 10:35 PM

"Light speed AF" sounds good.

AFF (autofocus flexible) sounds good too. It appears to work like Nikon's 3D Focus Tracking, which is a crazy good way of keeping a subject in focus.

RyanW · 11-08-2011, 11:04 PM

I'll probably spring for the GX1 or the G3 with a prime or two and general purpose zoom. What I'm really wanting is a PEN with a built in EVF and better sensor. Until then, I'll go with the Panasonic and if Oly never makes the exact camera I want, Panasonic will probably keep me happy.

Tonto · 02-15-2012, 05:48 AM

Here a link to DPReview of it Panasonic DMC GX1 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review

I for one love this camera! its near perfect carry anywhere, if you want the EVF just put it on! The video functionality isn't as good but that doesn't bother me

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
My thoughts on the Panasonic GH2	johnmflores	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	123	09-12-2011 07:25 AM
Panasonic GF2	Jasvox	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	6	11-07-2010 01:08 PM
Panasonic LX5 or Pentax K-X?	catastrophe	Troubleshooting and Beginner Help	9	09-16-2010 07:31 PM
Anyone here has the Panasonic Lumix Lx3	rustynail925	Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands	9	09-08-2010 07:03 PM
Samsung GX1 L	fishy	Pentax DSLR Discussion	6	07-22-2008 10:25 AM

11-06-2011, 10:08 PM	#16
johnmflores Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Somerville, NJ Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 5,361	Originally posted by Aegon Built-in VF or not, what makes this camera special? I saw something about sensitivity approaching Sony, which is probably (by my guess) closer to rumor than reality. Otherwise, it looks like other µ43 bodies. I get consistently clean ISO1600 from my GH2, and have manage clean ISO3200 as well: If the GX1 uses the G3 sensor, then it will be at the same level as the GH2 and maybe even a half-stop better. Pair that with the excellent 20mm/F1.7, and you have a very good low light camera that fits in your jacket pocket. As good as the K-5? No, but the K-5 won't fit in my pocket, even with the DA40. Quote: BTW, I'm uneducated about the Panasonic camera line. I'm really wonder what the fuss is about when from where I sit it looks like an evolution of one of the basic µ43 body types. Does this camera provide wonderful new features or permit different approaches to photography? Yes, it is an evolution. Many owners of the GF1 have sat on the sidelines as Panasonic has released successors (GF2, GF3) that have veered away from serious amateurs and towards P&S upgraders with each generation. The GX1 is the spiritual successor of the GF1. I'm not as smitten with the rangefinder aesthetic, so I'd probably lean towards the G3 with the EVF and tilt-swivel screen if I was in the market. Quote: EDIT: To answer my own question: 43 Rumors \| Blog \| (FT5) Sources explains why "The GX1 is much better than you think". Summary: • sexy looking • high quality • better IQ from similar sensor (probably means they cook JPG better than before) Yea, probably. But some people like haptics and will be influenced by them in their purchase decision. For example, I love the way the K-5 feels in my hand compared to the GH2.

11-06-2011, 10:37 PM	#17
Aegon Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 1,416	Thanks for the good reply, John.

11-06-2011, 10:46 PM	#18
nickthetasmaniac Pentaxian Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 2,361	Originally posted by Aegon I'm really wonder what the fuss is about when from where I sit it looks like an evolution of one of the basic µ43 body types. As John said, it is an evolution (of the GF1), but it's an evolution that the 'faithful' have been waiting for for quite a while... Keep in mind that appearances don't make a camera - after all, a Nikon D700 and D300 look near identical on the outside

11-07-2011, 10:35 PM	#20
Aegon Site Supporter Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Portland, OR Posts: 1,416	"Light speed AF" sounds good. AFF (autofocus flexible) sounds good too. It appears to work like Nikon's 3D Focus Tracking, which is a crazy good way of keeping a subject in focus.

11-08-2011, 11:04 PM	#21
RyanW Veteran Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 583	I'll probably spring for the GX1 or the G3 with a prime or two and general purpose zoom. What I'm really wanting is a PEN with a built in EVF and better sensor. Until then, I'll go with the Panasonic and if Oly never makes the exact camera I want, Panasonic will probably keep me happy.

02-15-2012, 05:48 AM	#22
Tonto Inactive Account Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Wellington Posts: 969	Here a link to DPReview of it Panasonic DMC GX1 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review I for one love this camera! its near perfect carry anywhere, if you want the EVF just put it on! The video functionality isn't as good but that doesn't bother me