Originally posted by ElJamoquio I'm not so clear on it. The K-5/K-30/K-5II/K-50... I don't feel like there was/is a clear difference in price/features.
You're right, ELJamoquio, I should have used 'The k-5 family' to include the classic model. But whether you compare the older lineup of bodies, or the selection as it appears now, it's pretty much the usual cropped-format, three or four-tier selection. Same as Canon and Nikon, but a much smaller and slower pace. The usual $500 (kit) starter, which is now the K-500, the mid-range-and featured $700-$900 upgrade K30/50 (that C & N can afford to have variants of), and the $1200-$2000 flagship (again, N & C have more).
Now, the K-3 has all but replaced the K-5, once the remaining K-5IIs' go, we're back to 3-tier, K-3, K-50, K-500. There could be confusion during this transition period, but it's settling down again.
I don't mind that the new flagship has a different series number, in fact it seems right to me. This isn't a K-5 upgrade by any measure, it's a new camera. The baby 'fives' were born during the K-5's reign but just before the K-3 introduction, they're nearly as new. I see clear model/market/price divisions, which hasn't always been the case.
JMO,
Ron