Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
04-23-2014, 03:30 AM   #1
Veteran Member
Jasvox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,107
New Lytro Illum Superzoom

Lytro Illum camera lets users refocus blurred photos after shooting | Technology |

Interesting, but not cheap at $1500 USd.


04-23-2014, 04:32 AM   #2
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Far North Qld
Posts: 3,301
Much more advanced than the first square tube Lytro.
Looks like amazing tech, and a F2 lens through the entire 30-250mm range is pretty good.
I like the design too.
04-23-2014, 04:52 AM   #3
Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 32
Early days yet

QuoteOriginally posted by Jasvox Quote
Show me the specs ... starting with resolution of the resulting image. Does it do macro for which it would be most useful? etc
04-23-2014, 05:39 AM   #4
Veteran Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Far North Qld
Posts: 3,301

04-23-2014, 05:44 AM   #5
Emperor and Senpai
Loyal Site Supporter
VoiceOfReason's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mishawaka IN area
Photos: Albums
Posts: 6,103
Interesting, but how sharp is it? How pleasing are the pictures from it? What about the dynamic range, colors, and low light capabilities?
04-23-2014, 05:48 AM   #6
Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 32
QuoteOriginally posted by Steve.Ledger Quote
yes... nothing much there, that is what I mean

I'm very curious about the tech to the point I am a potential client... but this lack of specific information and emphasis on *ONE* spec only makes me very cautious about it. Badly played by the company... or the tech is not ready yet.
04-23-2014, 11:40 AM   #7
Veteran Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: So Cal
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,080

"Rosenthal: It's basically a 4x step up in terms of both number of pixels and underlying resolution, as well as sensor area size ... The sensor in the previous camera was 1/3", essentially a mobile sensor. This is a 1" sensor with an [underlying] 40-megapixel resolution.

It scales in multiple dimensions, so not only are we getting better 2D image quality, but we've also dramatically increased what we call the resolving power, which is essentially... The degree to which you can refocus in an image."
Q&A with Lytro's CEO and founder on the Illum: Digital Photography Review

04-23-2014, 06:05 PM   #8
Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 32
So... still cannot find the info, but let's assume that the resulting 2D image will about about 4 Megapixels? THIS is the problem.
04-23-2014, 06:11 PM   #9
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
Loyal Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,784
QuoteOriginally posted by Rob01 Quote
So... still cannot find the info, but let's assume that the resulting 2D image will about about 4 Megapixels? THIS is the problem.
...or less...

04-28-2014, 03:50 AM   #10
Veteran Member
JimmyDranox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ploiesti, Romania
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,630
4 or 5 Mp looks small, but we must consider that you can see the pictures on a monitor. So, 4Mp is enough for most of us (if you have a 4K monitor, is not). I don't know if or how is posible to print a picture from a Lytro camera, but the 3D like effects that I saw on their site are impressive. Not to mention the possibility to change the focus point, and the DOF.
04-28-2014, 07:51 PM   #11
Veteran Member
K-9's Avatar

Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,972
I believe the first camera was under $400, so this jump in price for something that didn't catch on the first time is massive.
05-03-2014, 04:57 AM   #12
Veteran Member
Imageman's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2013
Photos: Albums
Posts: 461
Why are you so fixated on megapixels.

My camera is less than 5 megapixels so what. I used to print highly detailed 10x8 prints from a 2 megapixel camera. Image quality does not depend on megapixels, it depends on the quality of those pixels and what you can do with them. I can print highly detailed images well beyond A3 from my current 5 megapixels. Who really needs any more than this.

The original cameras produced photographs 5 inches across, for 150 years 7x5 was the largest print most people wanted, a few artists wanted larger 10x8 prints. Professionals wanted larger than that so they used more specialist medium format or large format gear.

Exactly how many wedding albums are 6 feet by 4 feet in size, I haven't seen any. People don't want or need prints beyond A4

So why do we now demand images that can print onto billboards. when did you last print an image 10 feet long

The 5 megapixels images from this camera should be printable up to 3 feet x 2 feet, is there an issue with this?

The technology looks interesting so lets see what its really capable of before consigning it to the dumpster of life.
05-03-2014, 05:19 AM   #13
Junior Member

Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 32
Taking photos is not just about printing them. Taking digital photos can mean cropping or simply zooming in to check out some details. If what you said was true, there would be no point to taking gigapixel panoramas.

Of course the number of pixels is not everything. Nobody will argue with this one. However, resolution and quality wise you do need more than 4 megapixels in this day and age (good pixels).

I would be happy to be proven wrong on this one, by time or someone else... BUT my impression from the camera launch and the few details I managed to find out is that the technology is not ready. Why would I buy this thing when I can save my money for a holiday? Or a nice new Sigma Art lens or two? Or a new m43 camera? Or sigma SD1? Your mileage may differ, but there are other things I would get first within limited cash and time to play.
05-03-2014, 08:12 AM   #14
Veteran Member
JimmyDranox's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Ploiesti, Romania
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,630
By now, Litro can look strange, but this technology has the potential to be a game changer. As well as the curved sensor from Sony.
05-12-2014, 09:18 PM   #15
Forum Member

Join Date: May 2008
Location: BC
Posts: 93
Truly F2.0?

Based on the way the technology works - I'm not sure that this lens is truly F2.0 throughout the zoom range - or really anywhere near F2.0 - and besides - it wouldn't need to be. I thought the image was reconstructed from the incident information in front of and behind the imaging sensor to provide information about the OOF area. Essesntially the sensor records optical information - but in a way that is very different than the traditional. Ie: you cannot look at the light falling on the sensor and see what the sensor sees?

  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
illum, lytro, lytro illum
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lytro on Woot TER-OR Pentax Price Watch 5 03-26-2014 04:03 PM
Lytro-Esque Hack for any camera using MF + Video ajw85 Photographic Technique 3 12-17-2012 02:38 PM
Lytro camera, witchcraft? gzq916 Photographic Industry and Professionals 4 07-16-2012 09:28 PM
Lytro Clicker Non-Pentax Cameras: Canon, Nikon, etc. 16 02-16-2012 07:55 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]