Originally posted by tuco And I'd argue FF cameras that delivers cleaner shots with more dynamic range in that ISO range are still are better low light cameras than the K-3.
And that's a valid argument. But great AF and metering sensitivity doesn't do any harm, and sometimes it helps get the shot. There have simply been times in the past when shooting dark scenes even at lowish ISOs with the K-5 or K-x (both -1 EV AF sensitivity) when the AF simply refused to work, so -3 EV would have gotten me some interesting shots I regret having missed. Plus better sharp and in-focus with some noise than no-noise but OOF.
Best situation is both sensitive AF+metering and a high DR FF sensor. In K-mount, of course.
---------- Post added 2014-06-19 at 09:49 AM ----------
Originally posted by jogiba K-3 the only camera to match the A7s as a low-light shooter ? I don't think so.
In terms of
getting the shot, yes it probably is.