[neostyles]

Do alot of portraits and the diffrence in sharpness it pretty noticeable between my d600 and the nx1. If anyone has sharper nx1 portraits gladly post them because i want to get me some of dat 4k action pretty badly

May end up just getting the nikon ff mirrorless if its not too long before they release it or getting the nx1 as a movie camera.

---

Last edited by neostyles; 09-30-2015 at 08:31 PM.

[Daniel1977]

@neostyles,

• NX 16mm F2.4
  
  
  
  
  
• ƒ/2.8
• 16.0 mm
• 1/30
• 200

[Daniel1977]

Jump, taken with Single AF setting.

[Daniel1977]

Few night shots:

[Daniel1977]

I do not know if anyone is interested, but I paste something.
RAW photo taken rather badly, but as you can see, you can pull out a lot from it.


Properly captured image, without processing.

[rawr]

Nice to see Samsung uses DNG. The Pentax heritage, I guess.

Seems like there is some useful dynamic range there in the NX-1 at ISO 100. However you boosted exposure less than a stop, and only only gave a tiny push to the shadows. Any old camera can do that without problems nowadays from ISO 100. How does it look if you do the same from ISO 3200?

[Emacs]

Seems like there is some useful dynamic range there in the NX-1 at ISO 100

It is just 0.7 stops, even canon can () that.

[Daniel1977]

Nice to see Samsung uses DNG. The Pentax heritage, I guess.

Seems like there is some useful dynamic range there in the NX-1 at ISO 100. However you boosted exposure less than a stop, and only only gave a tiny push to the shadows. Any old camera can do that without problems nowadays from ISO 100. How does it look if you do the same from ISO 3200?

Hmmm Yap, ISO100 is little wrong example






And one ISO6400

[VisualDarkness]

NX1 truly looks like a winner and together with Samsungs wonderful lenses it should be a solid system very soon. My brother had the outstanding 85/1.4 for his NX1000 but it was a bad match balance-wise, though it would probably be really good with the NX1.

[neostyles]

Dynamic range is similar to the d600/d750 from what ive heard and i could pull a hell of a lot of detail from the iso 3200 shots on my d600. In fact, if i remember correctly, it had almost 2 stops of dynamic range over high end canons (was the 7dmk2 or the 6d i dont remember) and maintained its advantage until iso 1600
Samsung NX1 Review - The glory of technology - EOSHD

I spent some time over the holidays taking a train ride through some very scenic parts of the country and i had to use ~iso 3200 to freeze the epic scenery and what i can say is that it defenitely did it's job. If the NX1 offers the same thing in a body 200 grams lighter def excited. There is alot about this thing that im excited about actually. I know for sure that my next camera will probably not be a DSLR, im switching to mirrorless in the not too distant future Thing is though im wondering if it can match ff for sharpness. Anyone have any full size shots they wouldnt mind sharing?

[Daniel1977]

85mm is like jar with water NX1 is only one witch don't look strange with this lens.
Here one more ISO6400 with Auto enabled at Lightroom 5, in my opinion image is quite good for 6400



https://www.flickr.com/gp/didmyself/9355xd



https://www.flickr.com/gp/didmyself/ri5ET2