Originally posted by cali92rs You break out this strawman argument quite a bit.
I don't know if I have read one single person on this message board or any other that have said that "If I had a FF, it would make me a pro"...or..."if I had FF, I would be a much better photographer".
"......,but will find it hard to be satisfied with landscapes or wildlife shots,once I use the FF system, and the amount of detail there is, and low light capabilities."
No, not in those specific words, but close enough to read between the lines. Certainly looks like expectations that exceed probabilities to me? See it often? Yep, here and other sites too. I don't often hear
"I just want to spend a lot more cash for fractionally better results." Most seem to be hoping for a miracle, and miracles are few from what I have seen as noted in my comment.
I have no dog in the hunt and don't care what a person shoots with, but I do respect a certain amount of reality in praising the virtues of FF, and often that reality is left out of the conversation.
To make it clear, I do know a good number of shooters here that could dazzle with a FF camera, I could name a dozen quickly. I could also name many more that couldn't. My point was not to condemn, but to get the benefits to the masses of a FF camera into the area of reality.
Not sure that is a worthy idea, apparently not for you, and you may be right. Just saying I once dumped an old girlfriend for a new and flashier model with regrets that lingered for a long time.....and were also very costly!
Best Regards!