Originally posted by osv talk about stepping up to the plate! nice pics
looking forward to hearing how it compares to sony gear.
Thanks.
I think the Nikon 1 is a good complement to Sony and for me is a valid "third system" after full frame and APS-C. I've considered Micro 4/3 several times, but it always fell into the category of "not worth it" (the size reduction for body and lenses aren't significant enough to compensate for the quality drop from APS-C).
As we both know, Sony isn't great for action, except perhaps the A6000 and even then the buffer size is too small. The Nikon 1 is fast, responsive, have medium sized buffers that make it worthwhile for those situations where the Sony bodies just aren't snappy enough.
The V2 is the smallest and lightest of the V bodies, and doesn't have the annoying limitations of the V3 (Micro SD, external viewfinder).
Battery life is excellent - I shot well over 300 photos today, and the battery level remained at "full" so I suspect the battery can easily last a whole day's shooting.
It is an excellent camera to take on a bush walk - small and light enough not to be a burden. Here is a photo, taken on the 30-100mm zoom from today's walk: