Originally posted by reeftool You're getting some very nice results from your phone, Christine!
The Flickr statistics are confirming what a lot of people are discovering. The iPhone has an excellent camera and the quality of it's photos hold up very well. At least for me, it won't be a camera replacement simply because of the limits it has. It's a fixed lens camera with a moderate wide angle view. That fits a lot of peoples everyday shooting. I can take very good snapshots of friends and get some pretty good landscapes but I often need a wider view and even more often, a telephoto. Yes, you can zoom but that is essentially the same as cropping in PP. I need an optical zoom. I have rather large hands and I find using the touchscreen controls difficult and in winter, almost impossible, not that a small P&S is much better.
I'm not going to compare my iPhone to a DSLR although the phones IQ is very good. I will compare it to another camera I own and that's the Panasonic LF1. It a high end P&S with a Leica branded zoom and a 1/1.7 sensor. In conditions like yesterdays shot, the iPhone rules! The LF1 is terrible in in strong, bright light will severely overexpose in every AF mode the camera offers. The battery fails rapidly in the cold, even in an inside coat pocket. I had hoped to use it for skiing shots as the lens zooms to a 200mm equiv. but this thing just refuses to work in cold weather. The iPhone will also shut down in below 0F temps but will perform fine if kept in an inside pocket. The iPhone will expose photos nicely in any light.
I have had some very fine shots from my LF1. The lens is excellent and sharp and it does have a viewfinder which is very helpful. I can get shots with it that the iPhone just won't do. It's very good with macro/close up shots and despite it's small lens, bokeh is possible and of course, having an optical zoom is a big plus. It's actually smaller than the iPhone 5s although thicker. Both fit in my pocket. The LF1 shoots RAW but the exposure accuracy and dynamic range of the iPhone 5s is so good that I don't consider that much of an advantage. I often have to make exposure adjustments of LF1 shots in Lightroom while the iPhone usually nails it. At least until spring, the LF1 will gather dust unless I'm going to be indoor shooting at a party although the iPhone does well with that also.
After a year with the iPhone 5s, I'm relying on it's camera more and more. If I had bought the iPhone a few months earlier, I can say with certainty that I would not have purchased the LF1. I don't use Flickr much but most of my Facebook uploads and Google + uploads have been iPhone shots so I don't doubt the Flickr stats one bit.
I agree with your observations.
I don't think the iPhone is a true camera replacement for a serious photographer (it is for 90% of the population though) but I am exploring how it influences the creative process.
There is no doubt the photos I take on the iPhone are quite different from the photos I normally take and my workflow is different too. For example, I am much more heavy handed with the processing and less precise. It is difficult to edit precisely on an iPhone so I let it go and strive for a different look.
Some people have noted they take different pictures on a film camera vs a digital camera. I think it's the same here. Anyway it's all good - I like exploring different paths, and photography isn't my only creative medium (I also compose and play music, and freehand sketches using different tools/paper).
My iPhone photo of the day: