Originally posted by surfar
Firstly the 2 newbies. 50mm f1.0
and 70-300 f4-5.6
Then version 2 of 27mm f2.8
and 10-24mm f4
No details yet of how the version 2 differ from the originals.
I understand that the 27mm will have an aperture ring. I've seen pictures that show one, if they're fake then they're very good fake. Makes me glad I haven't gotten one so far as I do like to use the aperture ring on my Fuji lenses, though I still can't really justify the 27mm as I have the 23/2, 35/1.4 and 18-55. The only possible justification would be size.
The 50mm is massive and in my opinion they should have (a) made it a bit longer and replaced the 56/1.2 or (b) stuck with the original plan of making it a 35mm and having a world-class super-fast standard prime (though the 35/1.4 is superb anyway). Not that I will ever have an f/1.0 as they'll be far too pricey.
70-300mm lenses aren't my thing largely because they make me think of poor quality third party optics but I can imagine a Fujifilm one might be pretty good and would be a more modern design than the likes of Sigma and Tamron, plus possibly smaller as it'll be made for APS-C rather than FF.