Originally posted by mecrox Have you seen a teardown of say the Nikon D500? Then compare that with a teardown of a Sony A7. It's quite hard to see the DSLR kind of camera assembly continuing as the mainstream method for more than a few years. There are just too many signs pointing another way, I think.
Why is it hard to see complex assemblies persisting? As complex as cameras may seem, camera makers have developed ways of manufacturing high-complexity objects at low cost. The cost differential between the Nikon and Sony is probably a lot lower than you think.
All the signs I see point toward products becoming more and more complex. Look at cars, aircraft, home appliances, etc. My microwave oven has a voice memo function!
Complexity is cheap and getting cheaper: advances in computer-aided engineering make designing complex stuff easier than ever; 3-D printing makes part complexity virtually free; and Foxconn (electronics contract manufacturer) is buying 1,000,000 robots to replace 500,000 assembly line workers.