yep... i think you are a big fuji fan and want us to join.
I also think fuji builds/built great cameras.
I like the fine film(analogue) compacts from fuji.
But shooting the fuji in a more sunlit situation (with that shiny highly exposed bushes in the background
) and the Pentax in the dark... well that seems a bit unfair to me.
It reminds me of some guy doin advertising for Canon cameras in here on Pentaxforums... LOL
(same person now got contracted by Fuji?-User "Pentax_WA" joined July 2017...) (he played with the white balancing and said, canon would do so much better... whilst it actually was a totally different lighting situation and 100% touched outputs)
furthermore:
I totally agree with Winder... calibrate the K-1 to your likings.. and it will win as high as a house... there are so many options to calibrate the color output...as well as the sharpening factor....
-that option is altering what you could adjust(or is adjusted automatically by the App) if you would refine a RAW in photoshop, but it does apply that directly to every photo that you shoot as JPG
many people dont even know that you can choose:
A)Sharpness
B)Fine Sharpness
C)Extra Sharpness
... and adjust the value either to the left or to the right.
BTW: For sure there are some Fuji lenses that are real sharp, but still there are equivalent sharp K-Mount lenses.
I am pretty sure the DFA 100mm F:2.8 WR stands pretty good against ANY fuji lens.
Dont get me wrong, i didnt test THAT much fuji lenses...
But even a comparison at dpreview(admitted i dont know what lenses they use), will not show a sharper picture on the fuji side, when you compare
... for instance.. XT-2 to K-3II
BTW... (only interesting for studio IMHO but the feature is very welcome)... Pentax has pixelshift. :P
P.S.: This is a situation where i want to remind every reader to read my signature and think about it.