Originally posted by jms698 Canon EOS 50D Hands-on Preview: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review
- New 15 MP sensor
- High ISO
- User-selectable high-iso noise reduction
- Better (and maybe actually useful) weather sealing (though then you still have to invest in an "L" lens)
- per lens AF micro-adjust
- Lens profiles (like Pentax's MTF mode)
All sounds like copy-cat from the K20d.
However, Canon has, of course, one-upped Pentax with the 3" VGA screen, 6 fps, contrast-detecting live view, silent mode, and ISO 12800 (although best to wait and see how horribly noisy it is).
Still, for $300 more than the K20d, I'd say Pentax still has a pretty good value proposition.
You guys really need to get out more often and see what is happening in the real world. No, Canon doesn't care about Pentax with its tiny market share. The real competition is Nikon, and to a lesser extent Sony and Olympus.
The Canon 50D is a direct competitor to the Nikon D90 in the mid-level DSLR market, and copies features from the Nikon D3/D700/D300, such as the high-resolution rear LCD, excellent high ISO performance, high frames rates, etc. The Nikon D300 had lens profiles before Pentax, and Pentax pretty much copied this feature from Nikon (and in response to users hacking the firmware for the K10D). Nothing copied from Pentax, except perhaps the need to have the highest mega-pixels in this class, so 15MB instead of 12-14MP.
Neither Canon nor Nikon changed the AF in the mid-line range, partly because their AF systems in the 40D and D80 are already better than the competition in the this class, and partly to give pros and rich amateurs a reason to move up to the pro-class cameras. The new Canon and Nikon mid-range cameras are loaded with gimmicky features to entice point-and-shooters to move up and spend additional money beyond the base models, like "creative auto" mode for Canon, "active D lighting" for Nikon, live view (easy to implement with a CMOS sensor, and in everyone's product line now (except Pentax)), etc. None of this stuff interests me, but bells and whistles sell products to unsophisticated consumers. I don't follow Sony or Olympus too closely, but they also have lots of new models out in the basic to mid-level range with all of the gimmicky features as well, plus improved AF as compared to their previous models.
All Pentax has right now is an entry level body (K200D) and a mid-level body (K20D). At one point in time, the K20D may have been at the top of the mid-level pile in terms of image quality with the Samsung 14MB sensor comparing favorably to the 10MP sensors in the Canon 30D and Nikon D80 (ignoring the relatively poor AF performance and slow frame rates of the K20D). But the market has moved a lot in 8 months, and Pentax is now trailing the pack in the very competitive mid-level category. Hoya/Pentax still doesn't have any offerings in the semi-pro or pro markets, which build prestige for the brand and generate a profitable upgrade path for existing users. And let's not get started on the limited range of lenses choices (where's the 60-250mm f/4??) and other shortcomings in the SLR system.
IMHO, Hoya/Pentax better get their collective butts in gear by the end of the year, or else they run the risk of being completely pushed off the retail shelf. The market isn't going to wait while they spend a year re-organizing their corporate structure. And just cutting the price on last year's models isn't going to excite anyone.