Originally posted by stevebrot this competing project
I thought we'd already covered that somewhere on this site. Essentially what they'll be dealing with there is an even more complicated system of exposure, stopping down, opening, focusing, etc. etc., to deal with the fact that they have to deal with different mounts that have different analogue aperture communication protocols. The shortcut IIRC was to operate them all manually as stopdowns, stopping OPEN for focus and offering aperture-priority exposure on the closedown.
The simple and brutal solution, of course, is to see if anyone in the deepest, remotest parts of China still has the K1000 assembly line in workable order and fire that up again. Yes, the K1000 has some obvious deficiencies (no self timer or DOF preview), but many here might argue that it is a well-proven compromise, and it is no less functional with M42 lenses on a decent adapter than almost anything the Kickstarters want to churn out.
And let's be honest; not all Kickstarters are frauds. Kickstarter has some total losers, true, but it depends very much on what they are trying to make. Lomography chose their lens designs well, either slip-out plates or stop-downs with very little to go wrong and no interface compromises required with anything it's intended to be mounted on. With their designs, it doesn't even matter if the blades are sticky; the stop-down nature of the lenses makes that irrelevant. Ask them to resurrect an Auto-Takumar or Super-Takumar design as originally built, though, and I suspect you would quickly find them having trouble. They know their limitations and they are sticking to them. I'm not sure that can be said about Ihagee or Reflex (on which note, google or do a twitter search for "Fyrefestival" for an example of what can happen when grandiose promises are translated insufficiently well to concrete reality).