Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 3 Likes Search this Thread
07-10-2018, 04:44 AM   #1
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: mid nth coast,nsw
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,142
A Bridge too far?...i doubt it.Nikon P1000.

....Not eveyones cup of tea but for some who dont print big ,this just announced Nikon builds the insurmountable bridge camera if you want to Zoom to the Moon!

125x zoom equivalent of 24-3000mm...4K video.Raw and Jpg..moving LCD...2.3zillion dot EVF,bluetooth and some other bells,whistles, drums and gongs.

I used the P510 when it was current(ok) and a friend has the P900(only 83xzoom) its quite good.

U$ 999 coming to a camera store near you(even though ya gota drive for hours)!


Last edited by surfar; 07-10-2018 at 05:58 AM.
07-10-2018, 05:31 AM   #2
Pentaxian




Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albuquerque NM
Photos: Albums
Posts: 475
Plus both Nikon and Canon
Will present both new high end mirror less FF camera to the end this year
From digital news
07-10-2018, 05:45 AM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mississippi, USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 854
The P series Nikon has always been a 'strong' camera. The grandson uses one, older model, and prefers it over a Rebel he has access to. 3000mm, ehhhh, might shoot Jupiter and it's moons
07-10-2018, 05:54 AM   #4
Pentaxian
jimr-pdx's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: now 1 hour north of PDX
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,897
It will sell, some big-tele users will be disappointed.. and hopefully more than two of them will join us!

07-10-2018, 06:02 AM   #5
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: mid nth coast,nsw
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 6,142
Original Poster

A brief 5 minute look.
07-10-2018, 06:56 AM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ChipB's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Eau Claire, WI
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 2,701
WOW! That's one incredible zoom range!
07-10-2018, 07:46 AM   #7
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
Looks like a great camera. The only thing I'm really wondering about would be the maximum aperture fully zoomed out. But, it looks like the perfect birding camera. Pentax simply doesn't make this type of camera.

The problem with my XG-1 tends to be diffraction at the long end. Without at least ƒ4 at the long end I'd expect this to be pretty much the same.

07-10-2018, 08:34 AM   #8
Pentaxian
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,184
QuoteOriginally posted by jimr-pdx Quote
It will sell, some big-tele users will be disappointed.. and hopefully more than two of them will join us!
The important question is its actual operating characteristics. When I first wandered in here four years ago, I was very close to purchasing a Canon SX-50 ... it is still a good camera, but it was replaced by the SX-60, which has an inferior lens {I've heard many complaints about it}, so the market remains "hot" for refurbished SX-50 models. Maybe Nikon will be able to give the P1000 a lens just as good, but longer, than what the P900 has, but only time will tell. And, of course, with these cameras you're stuck with the lens that comes with it.
07-10-2018, 08:37 AM   #9
Pentaxian
normhead's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Near Algonquin Park
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 40,451
AT least a camera like this you can play with in the store. Because of the size of it however, it's unlikely I'd carry that and another camera. I particularly like the manual focus setting for macro.
07-10-2018, 08:45 AM   #10
Pentaxian




Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Romania
Posts: 15,132
QuoteOriginally posted by ChipB Quote
WOW! That's one incredible zoom range!
Still worse than this:
Nikon Unveils the P?, the First Compact Camera with a 1458x Zoom Lens
07-10-2018, 08:59 AM   #11
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,594
I would be uncomfortable with the tiny sensor size.
07-10-2018, 09:58 AM   #12
Site Supporter
Site Supporter




Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 1,037
I don't get it. It seems like the worst of all worlds. The size and weight of a DSLR without the benefits of the larger sensor and ILC.

f/8 at the long end with a 16Mb 1/2.3" sensor sounds like diffraction city.


Who is the audience for this?
07-10-2018, 10:17 AM   #13
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Mikesul's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 7,594
QuoteOriginally posted by caliscouser Quote
I don't get it. It seems like the worst of all worlds. The size and weight of a DSLR without the benefits of the larger sensor and ILC.

f/8 at the long end with a 16Mb 1/2.3" sensor sounds like diffraction city.


Who is the audience for this?
It looks quite a bit larger than the Sony RX10IV with the 1" sensor and 600mm equivalence. That is already DSLR size but owners seem to love. it.
07-10-2018, 10:34 AM   #14
Pentaxian
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,184
QuoteOriginally posted by caliscouser Quote
I don't get it. It seems like the worst of all worlds. The size and weight of a DSLR without the benefits of the larger sensor and ILC.

f/8 at the long end with a 16Mb 1/2.3" sensor sounds like diffraction city.

Who is the audience for this?
Detail is not the end-all and be-all of photography.

Last year my family was at a county park when my wife could just barely see a bird out on the water, but the view she got through her binoculars was insufficient for her to identify it right away. It was close to sunset on a cloudy day, but I got out my birding kit, a Sigma 70-300mm mounted on a Q-7; in my rush, I incorrectly set the focal length to something over 400mm, so the IBIS was working against me, and the ISO value needed was much higher than I usually go with that camera, but I did get a photo that enabled a friend of hers to identify this bird as a "double crested cormorant", which is usually seen a short flight away on Lake Michigan Usually the photos I take with this kit are better; still not as good as I get with a 300mm mounted on my K-30, but better than nothing. If you're like me and will never fit an expensive long lens + TC into the budget, there is a real attraction to something like this
Attached Images
View Picture EXIF
PENTAX Q7  Photo 
07-10-2018, 11:07 AM   #15
Pentaxian
reh321's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Bend, IN, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,184
QuoteOriginally posted by caliscouser Quote
f/8 at the long end with a 16Mb 1/2.3" sensor sounds like diffraction city.
F/8 at long end with this camera is like f/32 with my K-30 {yes, some of my lenses go that far!}; it is there, but nobody demands that you use it.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
bridge, bridge too far?...i, camera, far?...i doubt it.nikon, nikon, youtube

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landscape A Bridge too Far Bob Harris Post Your Photos! 17 07-27-2018 01:02 PM
Landscape "A Bridge Too Far" Kerrowdown Post Your Photos! 14 07-27-2018 01:00 PM
Landscape a bridge not too far dcmsox2004 Post Your Photos! 2 02-12-2015 08:36 AM
Black & White a bridge too far dcmsox2004 Post Your Photos! 6 02-01-2012 05:10 PM
Misc Too close, Too Far? FHPhotographer Photo Critique 3 10-18-2009 04:54 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top