Originally posted by travelswsage Really impressive specs. We'll have to see whether this translates well to real world use.
You see what test come out of the GFX100 cropped, the A7r4 will have the same pixel pitch (~3.5um, I guess). Could be interesting for the apsc crop. But if Ricoh release an K3 successor with 26Mp, there will be little interest to switch from a K1 to a A7r4.
Originally posted by travelswsage Also, notable: 16 pic pixel shift mode
That, I think is likely more of a super-resolution approach than a 4 x frames RGB shift, algorithms are different I suppose.
---------- Post added 16-07-19 at 18:44 ----------
Originally posted by DeadJohn I wonder if A7r3 prices might come down a bit, making the r3 a direct K-1 competitor. 36mp remains adequate for me.
If I wanted more resolution / image quality, I'd rather get a 645z, X1D or GFX50R. I don't believe in smaller pixels, except for the purpose of making center crops, simply because all lenses have their MTF (resolution, contrast, aberrations) getting worse at the edges and corners of the frame. When pushing the mega pixels without increasing the sensor size, all you get is more resolution in the center but no more res. at the edges and corners.