Originally posted by biz-engineer I totally agree. Canon may have made a mistake to not have the same mount for their apsc and full frame mirrorless systems. Using the same Z mount for apsc and full frame is a good thing.
So they should have killed the EF-M mount? There's no way they will do that when the EOS M50 was the most sold MILC in Japan a year ago or so (going from memory here, I might be wrong).
EDIT: in any case, neither Canon nor Nikon have ever given a serious thought to their crop lens selection beyond an assortment of kit-like and consumer grade options.
Canon has what, the 24mm 2.8 pancake, the 17-55/2.8 zoom and the various superzooms/kits/two tele options (50-200 and 70-300? Is the 70-300 FF?) both with 4-5.6 aperture?