Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
10-19-2009, 02:57 PM   #1
Veteran Member
Gooshin's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, the one in Canada.
Posts: 5,610
theoretically...

if i set my camera's (k20D) white balance manually to a specific Kevlin figure

and do the same for on my friends Canon 7D,

should our white balances be 100% identical, in theory?

10-19-2009, 03:08 PM   #2
Damn Brit
Guest




I think so, in theory.

After all, you don't get brand specific greycards.
10-19-2009, 03:36 PM   #3
Ash
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
Ash's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Toowoomba, Queensland
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 23,920
Yes, in theory.
How often does theory equal practice?
I wouldn't be surprised if even the WB is slightly different between them.
But the colours will certainly be - depending on the lenses used...
10-27-2009, 03:03 PM   #4
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
To get a true idea of the difference, it would probably be good to compare 5 bodies of each camera.

10-27-2009, 03:05 PM   #5
Veteran Member
Eruditass's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2009
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,207
Interesting points brought up, lets see someone test it! Of course there would be no way to tell which one is more accurate without certain equipment..
10-27-2009, 03:10 PM   #6
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
An integrating sphere and a white "standard" would be one way but would only be feasible on a printed copy which would open up a different can of CanofWorms.
10-29-2009, 01:10 PM   #7
Senior Member




Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Broomfield, Colorado
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 152
Regrading WB and Color Temp(CT)...

Many cameras and published literature refer to Daylight CT at 5500 K.
I've notice the Pentax K20D uses Daylight CT about 5200 K.

Where or how does Pentax derive their value for CT that differs from so many other sources????????
Does that value include some offset corrections for the specific Bayer filter used on it's sensors or the specific color processing algorithms? If so, why not apply corrections internally and used the same numbers as most other literature uses.

10-29-2009, 03:32 PM   #8
Veteran Member
roentarre's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 11,783
Canon images are so dulled coloured and heavily smudged by AI filters.

You would get mixed results. Canon typically has bad performance concerning yellow to cyan colour while Pentax does the red and blue badly.
10-29-2009, 04:33 PM   #9
Veteran Member




Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Borås, Sweden
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 3,169
I think Canon does ok color wise... here's an escaping GBH who didn't want to participate in the shoot.



And 100% crop to show the smudging and other nasties.

10-30-2009, 03:41 PM   #10
Veteran Member
maxwell1295's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 2,703
WB can differ between 2 identical bodies so I would expect it to differ even more for different brands and models.
10-30-2009, 04:08 PM   #11
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
QuoteOriginally posted by maxwell1295 Quote
WB can differ between 2 identical bodies so I would expect it to differ even more for different brands and models.
That's why I suggested 5 sample bodies of each. All 5 of both would need to either come from the same production batch or 5 different batches.
10-31-2009, 12:02 AM   #12
Veteran Member
KungPOW's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,699
I understand the topic is WB, but the variation of colour between camera brands was brought up, so my two bits.

Yes colour profiles between Canon, Nikon, Pentax etc all differ. But it is so easy to make a colour profile in Lightroom, that the differences become irelevant. I would assume other PP programs allow this as well. So Nikon's images not as "punchy" as Pentax? big deal. Tweak the profile, apply to all images, and you are done.
10-31-2009, 08:43 AM   #13
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
QuoteOriginally posted by KungPOW Quote
I understand the topic is WB, but the variation of colour between camera brands was brought up, so my two bits.

Yes colour profiles between Canon, Nikon, Pentax etc all differ. But it is so easy to make a colour profile in Lightroom, that the differences become irelevant. I would assume other PP programs allow this as well. So Nikon's images not as "punchy" as Pentax? big deal. Tweak the profile, apply to all images, and you are done.
I see what you are saying . . . to a point. It still wouldn't hurt to compare images straight out of a camera. In the film era, no one would be saying, "yeah the film sucks but let the processor fix it . . . "

When I'm doing an image for scientific purposes, I won't it as close to what I see as possible whether it is for a presentation or journal.
10-31-2009, 10:43 AM   #14
Veteran Member
KungPOW's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,699
In the film era people celibrated the various characterists of different film. kodachrome certainly does not have the first prize for acurate colour.

As for getting archival quality colur acuracy now, how do you do it? All cameras have variation in their colour profiles. How do you get the best possible colour reproduction? (i'm not asking this retorically, I really want to know).
10-31-2009, 10:51 AM   #15
Moderator
Site Supporter
Blue's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Florida Hill Country
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 17,377
QuoteOriginally posted by KungPOW Quote
In the film era people celibrated the various characterists of different film. kodachrome certainly does not have the first prize for acurate colour.

As for getting archival quality colur acuracy now, how do you do it? All cameras have variation in their colour profiles. How do you get the best possible colour reproduction? (i'm not asking this retorically, I really want to know).
There are actually color standards out there that the sensor images can be compared to. This has to be done with instrumentation such as integrating light spheres etc. to calculate the hue.

We now that individual units (i.e. camera bodies) will have some variation. That is why we would use at least 5 bodes. This variation is what allows us to statistically compare them.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How small could a K mount camera be theoretically? emr Photographic Technique 4 07-08-2009 08:07 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:38 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top