Originally posted by jogiba I think most people would use the GH2 instead for serious HD video with external mic.
I think that clearly separating the GH and G lines is Panasonic's stratergy with the G3. Really, if you're keen enough on video to be using an external mike, then you're going to want the GH2. I wander what percentage of G2 users ever touched the mike socket?
I don't see this as a clear replacement for the G2. I think that Panasonic has realised that their market placement of the G2 was off and have re-assessed with the G3. This may annoy some G2 owners hoping to upgrade, but for the majority of intended buyers I think Pana has very much got it right.
With the GH2 and now G3 showing that Panasonic has well and truly overcome the "CDAF is slow" issue, and the G3 showing that they've finally figured out an effective jpeg engine, I'm seeing a bright future for the G-series