Originally posted by c.a.m Have you considered becoming an Ambassador for the brand? I think you'd be a prime champion.
I'll have to learn how to use the camera effectively first. Thus far, I've been shooting "enthusiast-level" cameras, so this is quite a big step for me. I'm not expecting to get the best results initially... I reckon I'll need to put in some work before I'm capturing images worthy of "brand ambassador" status.
Originally posted by boriscleto It's a giant...far to large...
That's a cool little camera, but missing many professional features - such as an LCD screen, multiple control buttons, and a lens cap. Still, it could make a nice backup unit.
Originally posted by MarkJerling Selfless sacrifice Mike! I'm looking forward to your professional review of this fine piece of machinery.
In the mean time, don't hold your breath - I won't be boxing up the K-1II anytime soon!
I understand your caution, Mark. Hopefully, my forthcoming review will address all your concerns and give you the confidence to buy the new camera. At this price, you could afford to keep the K-1II for day-to-day shooting, and bring out the pro camera for more serious assignments. In any case, with respect, I imagine the resale value of the K-1II will drop like a stone once the results of my review go public.
Originally posted by Des I'm sorry to have to report that (in a reversal of the conventional pattern) this innovative and distinctive design has already been ripped off by a Japanese company. You can see how they have blatantly copied the design on their lens caps. The Japanese company seems to have chosen a name to boast about the hefty size of their products, but the misspelling shows it's fake.
Disappointing, indeed. In fact, further research shows that company's lenses also sport the red trim ring. They couldn't be more blatant about it. Sadly, many beginners will be fooled into buying these products...
Originally posted by PJ1 would 16X digital zoom mean effectively a 1MP image at full zoom? (Irrespective of any decline in optical quality, does the number of effective megapixels halve at each step for 2, 4, 8 and 16? Or does it not work that way?)
I'm not sure exactly how it works... What really matters, though, is that we still get 16MP photos regardless of the zoom level. And with that many pixels, we can be assured of high image quality....