Originally posted by emilf (snip)
How's the 1D mkII going to stack up? Don't know about its AF capabilities. From what I read the 5D is not as good a choice as the 7D when it comes to fast action. Having a lot of reach can be important at the track, so I like the 1.5x of APS-C cameras - how's a FF camera going to hold up there?
I've only used a 1DsmkIII, which is probably the best camera I've ever used - I like the ergos on my D700 more. I think pingflood has a 1DsmkII, I bet he can give you some good insight on overall body performance. For sure, the 5D will not offer the AF performance you're looking for.
I think the 1DmkII sensor is APS-H, which works out to 1.3x reach.
Most likely the 7D will have better IQ than the 1DmkII, but the 1D will have better build quality, withstand harsher conditions, go longer between charges, etc. Just a guess. Overall the 7D is a pretty awesome body, but some people prefer the pro-body sometimes for the reasons listed above. Similarily, I know there's a few "D2X vs. D300" threads at FM.
Originally posted by emilf (snip)
I'll probably need more reach than 200mm (more likely 400mm minimum), but I don't need VR with what I am shooting. Any suggestion for lenses to look out for?
I'll have to check out FM and see what prices are there. I also have KEH locally here. Their quality and grading is great, but probably also a little on the expensive side too.
On the cheap side, people like the 70-300 VR, although the 200-300mm range is not great.
You could look for a Nikon 300/4 AF-D, might be around $500-600 used.
But if you're on a budget AND you need 400mm+, you should look at the Canon 400/5.6 for $1139 new, or the Canon 100-400 IS for $1399 new. You could go with the Bigma, but in general the Canon/Nikon bodies AF better with their own lenses compared to third party ones. And that's what you're switching for, right