Originally posted by Pentaxor
zxaar, I have no idea why and how you got that kind of result from the K-7. but it sure thus is far from what I am getting from ISO 100 and even at ISO 200. I could increase and boost the ISO a lil bit more to 400 and my image would still be better than that from what you got.
actually i tried twice on different days and i always got similar results.
Anyway i am not basing my conclusion on this one file.
and to be honest, i have seen much better images posted by k7 users.
Anyway, what i did conclude was that using k7 means using it in raw, which i do not like to do. ( i will change my tune in a minute you will see).
When k-x released i got much better out of jpeg and that killed my deal with k7.
So about not using dng, using raw was not really big deal was k7 too because it saves dng format.
With k-x i found out that i can not control sharpness / saturation/ contrast in jpeg so jpegs are out of question and i am back to dng.
What changed though is i spent 500$ less with k-x and got the same thing.