Originally posted by Kalki some kind of post production going on
Actually, if the photofinishing is done by a good lab on quality paper, the original prints will look even better than what you see online, with truer colours and much better dynamic range. Unless you have a $2000 colour calibrated display, your computer will distort the colours and even a Retina display doesn't have the resolution of a quality print. Monitors tend to be brighter however, because they shine light at you, instead of reflecting ambient light, which makes the images seem "louder." It's been a long time since I had prints digitized with a drum scanner, but even that process doesn't capture everything you can see on paper. There isn't a flatbed scanner made that doesn't require heavy image processing just to make the digital file look as good as a $0.25 drug store one hour photo print.
Originally posted by Kalki longish exposures?
A lot of the photos in the Instagram gallery appear to be taken with short focal lengths, during the day, with minimal artificial light, so there probably was no need to go with long exposure times. The second picture in this thread was taken at dusk, but with a wide angle lens, so it could have been taken at ~1/30 sec. and pushed when developed. With 400 ASA film, maybe even 1/60, so no tripod.