Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 4 Likes Search this Thread
04-05-2017, 10:33 AM - 3 Likes   #1
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
cheekygeek's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kearney, Nebraska USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,261
Dec. 1976 Camera 35 magazine: EXCLUSIVE Report: Pentax ME & MX, M-series lenses

Dec. 1976 Camera 35 magazine. Scans of cover and article pages:

Dec. 1976, Camera 35 Cover (featuring the new Pentax ME & ? | Flickr
Dec. 1976, Camera 35 magazine: Ultra-Compact Pentax ME and? | Flickr
Dec. 1976, Camera 35 magazine: Ultra-Compact Pentax ME and? | Flickr
Dec. 1976, Camera 35 magazine: Ultra-Compact Pentax ME and? | Flickr

04-05-2017, 10:43 AM   #2
Pentaxian
murrelet's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 506
Thanks for scanning and posting. This is great, considering the MX is my go-to camera and I just acquired an ME (might become my street shooter).
04-05-2017, 11:22 AM   #3
Veteran Member
pete-tarmigan's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conception Bay South, New-fun-land
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,272
I wonder what they meant by "full-frame" in 1976? The ME was released long before the Advanced Photo System (APS) used part of the 24x36 mm frame for non image-related data, thereby leaving the image significantly smaller than 24x36 mm. I never heard the term "full-frame" applied to image size until DSLRs became affordable for non-professionals and buyers discovered that the sensors were smaller than 24x36 mm despite having lens mounts designed for 24x36 mm images.
04-05-2017, 11:35 AM   #4
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,235
QuoteOriginally posted by pete-tarmigan Quote
I wonder what they meant by "full-frame" in 1976?
There were half frame cameras then going back to the 60's if not earlier.

04-05-2017, 12:08 PM   #5
Veteran Member
pete-tarmigan's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Conception Bay South, New-fun-land
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 1,272
QuoteOriginally posted by LesDMess Quote
There were half frame cameras then going back to the 60's if not earlier.
Oh, I see...that was before my time. They seem to have disappeared from the market by the time I was old enough to earn enough money from delivering newspapers to be able to afford a 126 format film Kodak camera (mid-1970s).
04-05-2017, 12:34 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,235
QuoteOriginally posted by pete-tarmigan Quote
Oh, I see...that was before my time. They seem to have disappeared from the market by the time I was old enough to earn enough money from delivering newspapers to be able to afford a 126 format film Kodak camera (mid-1970s).
Half frame cameras were a weight and size savings before the Olympus OM series and subsequently the Pentax M series.



They could me your number of exposures too!
04-05-2017, 12:38 PM   #7
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,477
QuoteOriginally posted by pete-tarmigan Quote
Oh, I see...that was before my time. They seem to have disappeared from the market by the time I was old enough to earn enough money from delivering newspapers to be able to afford a 126 format film Kodak camera (mid-1970s).
There were half-frame cameras into the 1980s, like the Yeshica Samurai...The Olympus Pen series made it into the '80s too...but the heyday was the 1960s. Small full frame cameras like the Rollei 35 and Olympus XA made them kind of pointless...but it would be hard to find a SLR smaller than the Pen F...

04-05-2017, 01:12 PM   #8
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
ChrisPlatt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rockaway Beach NYC
Posts: 7,697
Another reason half-frame 35mm cameras became popular in the 1960's was that
color film and processing had become widely available but was relatively expensive.

Chris
04-05-2017, 01:29 PM   #9
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
cheekygeek's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Kearney, Nebraska USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 1,261
Original Poster
Half Frame is only part of the story. If you peruse the ads in the magazines at this same time, 110 film was the rage. You may recall that Minolta made two models of an SLR 110 film camera and that Pentax got into the act also with its 110 SLR system. This is the back cover ad (prime real estate) of the Nov. 1975 Camera 35 magazine (same issue that had the K2, KM, KX reviews).


However, speaking of 1/2 Frame cameras, here is mine: Agfa Optima Parat

Last edited by cheekygeek; 04-05-2017 at 01:57 PM.
04-05-2017, 03:02 PM   #10
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 595
Fantastic. Still have and use my original Pentax ME. Had the winder too before it died. Nice little camera and works pretty well in its aperture mode or manual.
04-05-2017, 03:30 PM   #11
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
QuoteOriginally posted by murrelet Quote
Thanks for scanning and posting. This is great, considering the MX is my go-to camera and I just acquired an ME (might become my street shooter).
You'll have trouble deciding between them - each has its advantages, and the ME with SMC-M 40/2.8 is so compact it's practically pocketable (depending on the size & location of your pocket). For street shooting with bright light, the lens stopped well down and zone focused, and a relatively fast film loaded to keep the shutter speeds high, I can't think of a more ideal combination. Sure you might want to go to a 28mm or 35mm if you want a still wider view, but for handling in a compact package the M-series 40/2.8 pancake can't be beaten. Better still, carry a K mount to 49mm-thread reversing ring and you have macro available at the drop of a hat.
04-05-2017, 04:01 PM   #12
Pentaxian
deus ursus's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Stårheim, Norway
Posts: 659
QuoteOriginally posted by LesDMess Quote
Half frame cameras were a weight and size savings before the Olympus OM series and subsequently the Pentax M series.
Wow, that Olympus Pen is pretty huge! I always thought it was compact, but compared to the MX and Olympus' own OM-1 it's really big. I'd get really disappointed if I'd bought it from ebay or something to get a compact film camera, when I already have an ME Super.
04-05-2017, 04:57 PM - 1 Like   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: May 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Photos: Albums
Posts: 3,235
QuoteOriginally posted by deus ursus Quote
Wow, that Olympus Pen is pretty huge! I always thought it was compact, but compared to the MX and Olympus' own OM-1 it's really big. I'd get really disappointed if I'd bought it from ebay or something to get a compact film camera, when I already have an ME Super.
Of course back when it was released, the Olympus Pen F series was significantly smaller compared to others.



But it is fun to shoot a roll as you get double the number of exposures and it is setup in portrait mode.



It was probably the first true adaptable mount as Olympus made an adapter for practically ever lens mount available then. Here I was able to use it on my Nikon bellows with the Nikon adapter.



One thing you won't be disappointed with is the quality of the build - it is outstanding.


Last edited by LesDMess; 04-05-2017 at 05:10 PM.
04-05-2017, 07:14 PM   #14
Pentaxian
murrelet's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 506
QuoteOriginally posted by pathdoc Quote
You'll have trouble deciding between them - each has its advantages, and the ME with SMC-M 40/2.8 is so compact it's practically pocketable (depending on the size & location of your pocket). For street shooting with bright light, the lens stopped well down and zone focused, and a relatively fast film loaded to keep the shutter speeds high, I can't think of a more ideal combination. Sure you might want to go to a 28mm or 35mm if you want a still wider view, but for handling in a compact package the M-series 40/2.8 pancake can't be beaten. Better still, carry a K mount to 49mm-thread reversing ring and you have macro available at the drop of a hat.
I have a 28, 35, and 50. All M lenses. But... one of the local shops has a 40. Price is on the high side but I know it'll be in tip-top shape, so may be worth the premium. Really tempting. When I had my K100D, my main lens was the DA40. I loved that lens. So there's a sentimental calling to pick up the M40.
04-06-2017, 10:10 PM   #15
Senior Member




Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 151
Thank you very much for doing these, cheekygeek!
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
1976, camera, camera 35, dec, december, flickr, magazine, me, mx, pentax, pentax-m, photokina

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Caption Contest 21 Dec to 28 Dec NickDB Weekly Photo Challenges 13 12-29-2015 04:16 PM
Pentax ME 35mm Electronic SLR(1976-1979) perera Visitors' Center 6 10-27-2015 12:33 PM
Weekly Challenge Caption contest Dec 19th-Dec 26 gifthorse Weekly Photo Challenges 9 12-27-2013 06:42 PM
Picture of the Week Week 243. Dec 2 to Dec 16 arnold Weekly Photo Challenges 48 12-16-2012 04:40 PM
Picture of the Week 92 : 6 Dec - 20 Dec 2009 stevebrot Weekly Photo Challenges 47 12-19-2009 08:24 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top