Originally posted by normhead I have many film cameras, 120, 645, three 35mm. It's not like I'm opposed to film cameras. I am pretty opposed to actually using them however. So, all I'm interested in is what results can I expect from this process that would different than what I do now, which is a whole lot of chimping.
Just trying to distinguish between "stuck in the past" and "on to something."
Then why are you reading and posting in a film photography forum?
I don't know about others, but for me its not about results, its about process. For me digital photography is boring to do, and film photography is fun to do. On a lark I bought a Pentax SuperProgram a little over a year ago, and I had so much fun with it that I bought a Pentax 67, and a Bronica ETRSi, a Kodak Retina IIIC, a Pentax MX, a Nikon F2, a Nikon FA, a Nikon FM2n, a Pentax MZ-S, and a few misc small cameras like an Olympus XA and Canon QL17. And the funny thing for me--it wasn't gradual. From the day I received the SuperProgram, I haven't shot a single digital picture, because it is so much more fun to shoot film. The K3ii is now permanently demoted to digitizing duty.
EDIT: I should add--I totally get why most people shoot digital, it has a lot of benefits, but in the end I'm talking about what I enjoy.