As I've sent my LX to Eric to replace a viewfinder eyepiece, I loaded up the MX with some Delta 400 and wandered about. While I do miss the more 'extensive' metering display of the LX (more than +1/-1 EV), I'm finding I'm using the sunny 16 rule (and its derivatives) quite a bit these days, with the metered reading an afterthought. Shots are becoming very consistently well exposed.
Developed in DD-X, scanned at 2400 DPI. No EV adjustment, just a slight boost in black levels or 'medium contrast' in LR.
I'm a little on the fence with the Delta/T-grain style of films. Switching to DDX instead of ilfosol has helped things a bit, but I get the nagging feeling it's ending up a bit muddy at times, especially indoors. I have a (professionally) developed roll of Tri-X 400, and it seems to have a cleaner look to it, but it seems much more 'greyish' and lower constrast. Maybe more definition in the tones or just the layout of the grain structure, I don't know. For those of you who've been shooting film for a while, what's your opinion on how these turned out? Any developer/film combos you like?