[stevebrot]

so I guess I just never noticed before or avoid subjects with tangential lines

Well, lookie there. I did indeed take this photo and there the pincushion is!


Canon P, LZOS Jupiter-12 35/2.8, Ferrania Solaris 100 scanned on Nikon 5000 ED


Steve

[dsmithhfx]

[edmundrt]

Pentax Z-1p, Sigma UC 28-70mm f3.5-4.5 (a surprisingly good lens, and it'll cost you less than your lunch)
Kodak Ultramax 400

[Swift1]

This shows just how little distortion the Contax G Zeiss Biogon 28/2.8 has

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400
Epson V750-M Pro

[Eyewanders]

Well, lookie there. I did indeed take this photo and there the pincushion is!


Canon P, LZOS Jupiter-12 35/2.8, Ferrania Solaris 100 scanned on Nikon 5000 ED


Steve

Don't imagine you've any more Solaris100 kickin' round do ya????

---------- Post added 05-29-16 at 05:09 PM ----------

This shows just how little distortion the Contax G Zeiss Biogon 28/2.8 has

Contax G2
Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8
Kodak Ektar 100 @iso400
Epson V750-M Pro

Wow! It certainly does.

---------- Post added 05-29-16 at 05:11 PM ----------

Was sifting through some shots from 2014 while it drizzled this morning...


Pentax MX | K 50/1.2 | Ektar 100 | Pakon F135 Plus


Pentax MX | SMC-A 50/1.4 | Kodak Portra 400 | Pakon F135 Plus


Pentax MX | Vivitar Series-1 70-210/3.5 | Superia 800 | NCPS scan

[nickthetasmaniac]

Some shots from my first roll of Cinestill 800T. Metered at 640iso and for those interested I didn't use a filter for the daylight shot. It definitely throws out some peculiar colours when used like this in daylight, and the halation is very visible in the right/wrong conditions (Cinestill makes no bones about this) but overall I enjoyed shooting the 800T. I'll definitely picking up some more for my next film order

M2 and 50mm Summilux pre-asph (which is for sale if anyone is interested)

V550 scans







To give an idea of the film's exposure latitude, this was shot at f1.4 and 1/1000" - probably 3-4 stops overexposed for the car (more for the highlights)



---------- Post added 05-30-2016 at 01:26 PM ----------

Following on from the above post - a good example of where the halation can lend a lot of charm to a photo...

[stevebrot]

Don't imagine you've any more Solaris100 kickin' round do ya????

24 rolls (36 exp), I am ashamed to say


Steve

[Swift1]

24 rolls (36 exp), I am ashamed to say


Steve

Film trade...???

[Eyewanders]

24 rolls (36 exp), I am ashamed to say

Seriously?? Do not be ashamed good sir! How may I separate you from 1 or 2? (Oh how I love the stuff)

---------- Post added 05-29-16 at 09:24 PM ----------

(or 3 or 4...)

[Swift1]

Graflex Graphic View II 4x5
Schneider Kreuznach Angulon 120/6.8
Expired Kodak Portra 160NC
Epson V750-M Pro

[Jonathan Mac]

To give an idea of the film's exposure latitude, this was shot at f1.4 and 1/1000" - probably 3-4 stops overexposed for the car (more for the highlights)

Impressive. I like the look of this film and I think there's finally a local supplier that can get some for me, but it's pretty expensive.

Don't imagine you've any more Solaris100 kickin' round do ya???? [COLOR="Silver"]

I have the last roll of mine (the old Lomography Colour Negative 100 which I'm fairly certain is the same stuff) in my EOS 30 at the moment. It's a really nice film and I hope if/when Lomography get back on their feet they resume production of it, or something based on the old formula.

[Eyewanders]

Impressive. I like the look of this film and I think there's finally a local supplier that can get some for me, but it's pretty expensive.



I have the last roll of mine (the old Lomography Colour Negative 100 which I'm fairly certain is the same stuff) in my EOS 30 at the moment. It's a really nice film and I hope if/when Lomography get back on their feet they resume production of it, or something based on the old formula.

I remember that many were convinced that was Solaris, but I dont' think the newer stuff is/was (though from what I've seen the older rolls did look like it to me as well). I've gone through a few rolls of it (the newer, e.g. in the last year or two) and definitely not the same color palette. It was good looking... or rather some it was. I had really mixed results between rolls and finally stopped buying it.

[g026r]

I have the last roll of mine (the old Lomography Colour Negative 100 which I'm fairly certain is the same stuff) in my EOS 30 at the moment.

Older Lomography Color Negative 100 is Solaris, yeah. (The newer/current stuff is a Kodak emulsion of some sort.)

[dsmithhfx]

[Cuthbert]

I like it, what did you use?

However, I think you guys are bored by my motorbikes, so I decided to change subject...casual street photography:



Canon F1 AE, FD50mm f1.4, Portra 160.