Originally posted by wlachan ... Not much to say other than to rate it slightly lower, say 80, like other negatives for better exposure and finer grain.
Normally I'd agree, but for some reason Reala always looks overexposed to me when I run it through the MZ-S, ecspecially when I rate it lower than 100. The negatives are always more dense than any other color negative film I've shot. I sometimes wonder if it's not really closer to 160. I'd never under expose it intentionally without some serious testing, but I don't understand why it's so different than all my other negatives. I like it, particularly the greens, and it is also pretty manageable indoors with tungsten light.