Returning to real photography

séamuis · 02-15-2011, 07:54 PM

Originally posted by Abstract

Just seemed a little extreme is all. No offense taken....

that wasn’t meant to be hostile. sorry if it seemed that way.

stevebrot · 02-15-2011, 10:41 PM

Originally posted by Ratmagiclady

Ah, I'm assuming Seamuis is talking conventional B&W.

In that case the local labs are charging $5+ for 35 B&W...go figure...

Steve

stevebrot · 02-15-2011, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by Gooshin

i didn't know the noritsu scanned at time of developing, that is intersting.

My understanding is that the Noritsu uses a ccd array to do an all-at-once image of the negative, so it is not technically a scan. The file sizes are large, but the real-world resolution sucks.

Steve

Gashog · 02-16-2011, 04:48 PM

At Lime Rock with my K1000 and SMC M 50mm f/2.

Nesster · 02-16-2011, 05:33 PM

HA! Real photography doesn't use no built in meters, you have to know your light... and no built in focusing devices, you have to know your distance... and no coatings on no lenses neither, you have to know the direction of your light... and real photographers don't expect but maybe 8 or 12 or 16 max photos per roll, if they are even using something rolled up like toilet paper

a recent shot with a 1923 6x9 folder, a Goerz Rollfilm Tenax with a Dogmar f/4.5 10cm lens.

séamuis · 02-17-2011, 07:00 AM

Originally posted by Nesster

HA! Real photography doesn't use no built in meters, you have to know your light... and no built in focusing devices, you have to know your distance... and no coatings on no lenses neither, you have to know the direction of your light... and real photographers don't expect but maybe 8 or 12 or 16 max photos per roll, if they are even using something rolled up like toilet paper

a recent shot with a 1923 6x9 folder, a Goerz Rollfilm Tenax with a Dogmar f/4.5 10cm lens.

real photographers capture their photos on glass plates, which they coated themselves.

eddie1960 · 02-17-2011, 07:35 AM

Originally posted by séamuis

real photographers capture their photos on glass plates, which they coated themselves.

haha nice one, but Jussi is headed that way every month the cameras get older sooner or later this is where he will arrive

form my perspective go big or go home (only 5 lbs 4 oz)

Gozilla my new rangefinder (posted elsewhere as well)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
What is REAL photography? [final]	RioRico	Photographic Technique	54	06-21-2012 08:24 AM
Has anyone done real estate photography before?	jennverr	Photographic Technique	19	02-02-2011 07:17 AM
Returning to photography	LostAgain	Welcomes and Introductions	1	12-29-2010 07:25 PM
Returning to Photography and Pentax after 30years.	Touchwood	Welcomes and Introductions	3	10-08-2010 04:38 AM
Real Estate Photography	spun	Photographic Industry and Professionals	16	08-12-2009 09:43 AM

02-15-2011, 07:54 PM	#76
séamuis Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H. Posts: 5,979	Originally posted by Abstract Just seemed a little extreme is all. No offense taken.... that wasn’t meant to be hostile. sorry if it seemed that way.

02-15-2011, 10:41 PM	#77
stevebrot Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver (USA) Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 42,007	Originally posted by Ratmagiclady Ah, I'm assuming Seamuis is talking conventional B&W. In that case the local labs are charging $5+ for 35 B&W...go figure... Steve

02-15-2011, 10:44 PM	#78
stevebrot Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Vancouver (USA) Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 42,007	Originally posted by Gooshin i didn't know the noritsu scanned at time of developing, that is intersting. My understanding is that the Noritsu uses a ccd array to do an all-at-once image of the negative, so it is not technically a scan. The file sizes are large, but the real-world resolution sucks. Steve

02-16-2011, 04:48 PM	#79
Gashog Veteran Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NY Photos: Albums Posts: 523	At Lime Rock with my K1000 and SMC M 50mm f/2.

02-16-2011, 05:33 PM	#80
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	HA! Real photography doesn't use no built in meters, you have to know your light... and no built in focusing devices, you have to know your distance... and no coatings on no lenses neither, you have to know the direction of your light... and real photographers don't expect but maybe 8 or 12 or 16 max photos per roll, if they are even using something rolled up like toilet paper a recent shot with a 1923 6x9 folder, a Goerz Rollfilm Tenax with a Dogmar f/4.5 10cm lens.

02-17-2011, 07:00 AM	#81
séamuis Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Savannah, U.S./Baguio City, P.H. Posts: 5,979	Originally posted by Nesster HA! Real photography doesn't use no built in meters, you have to know your light... and no built in focusing devices, you have to know your distance... and no coatings on no lenses neither, you have to know the direction of your light... and real photographers don't expect but maybe 8 or 12 or 16 max photos per roll, if they are even using something rolled up like toilet paper a recent shot with a 1923 6x9 folder, a Goerz Rollfilm Tenax with a Dogmar f/4.5 10cm lens. real photographers capture their photos on glass plates, which they coated themselves.

02-17-2011, 07:35 AM	#82
eddie1960 Veteran Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Toronto Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 13,667	Originally posted by séamuis real photographers capture their photos on glass plates, which they coated themselves. haha nice one, but Jussi is headed that way every month the cameras get older sooner or later this is where he will arrive form my perspective go big or go home (only 5 lbs 4 oz) Gozilla my new rangefinder (posted elsewhere as well)