Originally posted by stevebrot Jussi...Did you read the item description for the auction? The camera has been roughly used and the question is always whether it makes sense to CLA a beater. Even if freshly CLA'd, the resale value is not much more than the asking price.
Just my opinion, however
Steve
True it has some dings and wear, but often a well used sample will work better than a pristine-looking one. Also, the seller has 100% feedback and indicates he's a camera dealer, so I would trust the characterization that the camera is operational.
My guess is that it is a good user camera, and that a CLA may be needed sometime down the road, but not necessarily immediately, depending on one's standards when it comes to things like that. I'd buy it with the expectation that I'd get good use out of it right out of the box, at an excellent price that goes a long way to mitigate any risk.
I would not expect to get all my money back after a CLA when selling this camera, but then that tends to be the case for most user bodies.
p.s. this is a lucky post for me, as much to my surprise I also got a second chance offering... for a 1932 Journal of British Photography annual.