[womble]

Lovely seagull and lanterne shot. I have one for you to see as well. Anyone else?

Pentax LX SMC Pentax-A 2.0/50 TMY400 Essauira, Morocco

Gull (1) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity

Brighton, Pentax KX, SMC Pentax 135mm f/2.5, Kodak BW400CN film, orange filter.

[arnold]

That's a lovely looking shot, well exposed and developed. I don't suppose you can remember the film?

I think it was Plus X Pan, but all the negative says is "Kodak Safety Film" which could be Panatomic
Edit: Checked again, and the film was my favourite Plus X, and here are a couple more from that strip. This camera is only a three element lens viewfinder with four shutter speeds and a f3.5 lens

[jt_cph_dk]

Gull (1) par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity

Brighton, Pentax KX, SMC Pentax 135mm f/2.5, Kodak BW400CN film, orange filter.

That´s three. Nice and sharp shot, with fine grain for a 400. And quite bright sky even with the orange filter Regards

[jt_cph_dk]

I think it was Plus X Pan, but all the negative says is "Kodak Safety Film" which could be Panatomic
Edit: Checked again, and the film was my favourite Plus X, and here are a couple more from that strip. This camera is only a three element lens viewfinder with four shutter speeds and a f3.5 lens

Nice to see these fifty years old shots, good work not the least considering the basic camera. Time-maschine.

[rob1234]

x-posted…

More British seaside action - Bournemouth!



Pentax 67ii
45mm f/4
1/125th @ f/13
Rollei Retro 400
Lab-developed, Epson 4870 scan

[arnold]

Dug up some more from 1961, taken with a Kodak Retinette 1A view finder. A basic camera without light-meter or rangefinder. Four shutter speeds and a Schneider 3 element Reomar lens.

[revdocjim]

I grabbed the SV on an impulse the other day, slapped on a 50/1.4 and found a roll of Presto in the fridge and carried that beautiful camera around for a day. No complaints!! []

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.

[arnold]

[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/aeomaster32/10853036645/]Two Women Talk, 1961[/url] by [url=http://www.flickr.com/people/aeomaster32/]arnold_broese[/url], on Flickr" target="_blank">

Two Women Talk, 1961 Sydney
Kodak Retinette 1A

[gofour3]

A couple from QE Park, Vancouver.

6x7 & 90/2.8 LS shooting Ilford SPX 200 with dark red filter:





Phil.

[pavpen]

These were taken with my ME Super after the diy mirror lockup service armed by SMC Pentax-A 50/1.4 and Ilford Delta Pro 100. Developed in Ilford DD-X stock.

Cheers.

P.S.: Was I spoiled by DSLR; they look too grainy for 100?


# 1 Sunset Transformation.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavpen/10881105916/in/photostream/


# 2

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavpen/10881066785/in/photostream/


# 3

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavpen/10881065615/in/photostream/

# 4

http://www.flickr.com/photos/pavpen/10881101556/in/photostream/

[alan_smithee_photos]

Rivi Madison

K1000, Voigtlander Nokton 58mm, Delta 3200 (@1600)

[Vendee]

Rivi Madison

K1000, Voigtlander Nokton 58mm, Delta 3200 (@1600)

Really pleasing grain with that Delta 3200@1600.

[alan_smithee_photos]

Really pleasing grain with that Delta 3200@1600.

Yeah, I really like it too. 3200 is down right gritty but 16 is nice.

[Nuff]

Yeah, I really like it too. 3200 is down right gritty but 16 is nice.

Looks really good, I have only ever used delta 3200 on MF and it's great. But looks good in 35mm as well. Which developer did you use?

[stevebrot]

P.S.: Was I spoiled by DSLR; they look too grainy for 100?

The grain on the Flickr copies looks fine to me. The sure test is to use a loupe to directly examine the negative. It also may be that you have artifact introduced in the scan process.


Steve