Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
06-09-2012, 08:11 AM   #1
Veteran Member
Todd Adamson's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 722
Which film? Which lens?

I'm always seeing old photogaphs (70s, 80s) that I love, and wondering about the gear. Some famous photogs are well-known for the gear they used, i.e. McCurry w/ Kodachrome and the Nikkor 105/2.5. But I wonder if there are any websites that compile such information, or any way at all to find out what film, and possibly what lenses were used for certain iconic shots.

06-09-2012, 08:13 AM   #2
Veteran Member
Todd Adamson's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Iowa
Posts: 722
Original Poster
I particular, this is the shot I'm tripping on at the moment (hoping this will work, posting from the epic craptastic Tapatalk app):

Name:  ImageUploadedByTapatalk1339254790.815641.jpg
Views: 342
Size:  123.6 KB
06-09-2012, 08:29 AM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 5,005
That's from Rosemary's Baby I think. On-set photo?
06-09-2012, 11:12 AM   #4
Senior Member




Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 161
Of course it is a guess and I risk to be stoned, but I would say the majority were taken with ANY brand camera, and then mostly with standard lenses, and then with Tri-X at 400 ASA. Todd, I believe the art of the images you are talking about, has to do with the photographers and not very much with their equipment.

06-09-2012, 11:20 AM   #5
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 7,140
With film, in general, the net results is more about the glass, film and developer than the camera body.
06-09-2012, 12:14 PM   #6
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 27,663
QuoteOriginally posted by Hilo Quote
Of course it is a guess and I risk to be stoned, but I would say the majority were taken with ANY brand camera, and then mostly with standard lenses, and then with Tri-X at 400 ASA...
I concur. 35mm camera of choice with normal or moderate wide-angle (35mm or 40mm) lens and Tri-X would have been the standard for photography of the type posted above for the era in which it was taken (1968). For a pro, the camera of choice represented a wide gamut. Pentax, Nikon, Topcon, Exakta, and Leica at the top of the list with a host of others further down.

As for availability of data, much depends on the photographer. Some kept meticulous records (Ansel Adams). Others are known for their tools and while records were not kept, we know what was used (Cartier-Bresson). Sometimes we at least know the film based on where it was published (National Geographic was pure Kodachrome for many years). For most, we know nothing.


Steve
06-09-2012, 06:30 PM   #7
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
germar's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 728
Todd and all:

Having been a film buff from that period, a great many stills you see of that era are indeed "stills" meaning cropped still frames from motion picture footage. Some of these images were set to monochrome and mass-printed on glossy stock for display in theater lobbies. They were very cheaply produced and often grew unstable (yellowed/curled) with age. In other instances they were prepared with a screen dot process for newspaper reprinting. But most of these films did not have still photogs working behind the scenes. The publicity department was brought in after principal photography was complete and they had to find stuff to use from the dailies.

I bring this up since if you look at the image of Mia Farrow (Yes, Rosmary's Baby 1968) you see strong grain as if this is a fairly substantial crop of the original 16X9 film aspect ratio in which the film was shot. Farrow seems to be acting in the photo, and camera position seems to be primary, as if Mia is acting for that perspective. Again, the film production would never waste time acting/posing specifically for stills ... this was something lifted from the motion picture itself.

So, to offer some sort of answer to your question, the film would have been a Kodak color reversal stock, possibly 35mm, maybe 65 mm. The camera would have been an Arriflex or Panavision unit with Angenieux or Panavision glass. Credit for the shot might go to William Fraker, the DP on the project.

No matter what the actual answer is, you are right ... the shot is wonderful and speaks to the artistry of both actress and production team.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
film, gear
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best budget or film lens to replace DA 18-55mm kit lens? amc654 Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 27 03-12-2012 02:33 PM
Getting started with film... let's talk about the film film! KeithM2 Pentax Film SLR Discussion 18 02-26-2012 09:22 PM
For Sale - Sold: Film bodies, 18-55mm II lens. dshombert Sold Items 5 10-18-2011 07:42 PM
Old film AF lens works on new k-x DSLR? Dairylander Troubleshooting and Beginner Help 8 06-25-2011 10:17 AM
FA/film lens recommendations Aaron.M Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 2 08-10-2010 01:20 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:11 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top