Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home

Show Printable Version Search this Thread
09-07-2012, 06:27 PM   #1
Veteran Member
PPPPPP42's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Photos: Albums
Posts: 847
Target clearancing Kodak Gold 200, worth buying?

I hope so because I bought it. Actually all of it.
They seem to be done carrying it, still carry the Kodak max 400 or whatever you call it.
They were clearancing (is that even a word?) the 24 exposure 3 packs for $5.04 a box. I wasn't sure how good a deal this is, and I forget whether or not I like this film (I know its no high class stuff) so I just bought all 6 boxes they had at that store. 4 expire end of 2013 and 2 expire end of 2014 (the ones in front of course because nobody back stocks).

So was this a worthy buy? I asked myself if 72 color exposures were worth $5.32 including tax (with no shipping like I would have online) and the answer was yes. That and my Super Program will be back soon from Eric to compliment the K1000. Normally I'm a 400 ISO guy but I tend to drop to 200 when its cheap film because I like wheat bread grain in pics, not hearty high fiber whole grain which tends to be where cheap 400 sits.

It helps that same Target develops and scans film still for pocket change (about $3.50 a roll developed and scanned) so I will be shooting the piss out of this stuff since they keep telling me they will be done developing film soon but they never get a certain date from corporate. It think they are slowly using up the remaining chemical stock and selling off the mini labs when they can find buyers but aren't rushing it.

This is either the Kodak 200 or 400 (which I only ever bought one box of I think) developed and scanned by that Target. Looks fine to me. EDIT: actually I just noticed my horizon is REALLY crooked, what the hell was I thinking. An I keep forgetting we have an actual film forum farther down, I'm sure someone will move this if anyone cares.

Last edited by PPPPPP42; 09-07-2012 at 06:37 PM.
09-07-2012, 06:57 PM   #2
Aegon's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,413
Good deal, I like that film despite its limitations.

My Target stopped processing film earlier this year. I wouldn't be surprised if yours stops soon.

(My Target also guaranteed to mess up development, every single time, so good riddance)
09-07-2012, 07:20 PM   #3
Loyal Site Supporter
foto guy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vernon, Connecticut
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 276
Just make sure to keep the film in the freezer until you use it. It'll keep for years after the expiration date.
And for best results, I'd suggest finding a real photofinishing place at which to have the film processed and scanned. You'll likely get much better results that way.
09-07-2012, 08:02 PM   #4
Veteran Member
PPPPPP42's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Photos: Albums
Posts: 847
Original Poster
I'm not sure its worth the rather ridiculous costs that real places charge considering the price and quality of this film, they have done very well with all the BW400CN that I sent them before I started setting the darkroom up and the several rolls of color so far, so I trust them to manage these. No need to freeze it, this will be gone in a year tops, probably much less. I plan to use at least 1 roll a week if possible to take advantage of it while they still do developing, I think this store was lower on the priority list for selling off the mini lab because more people around here still use it and the nearest photo place is an hour away.

09-07-2012, 08:14 PM   #5

Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 7,103
Kodak introduced it's new, reformulated versions of its KODAK GOLD 100/200 consumer films at the 2007 PMA Show. I've seen some nice, natural results from some of the posts here on PF.
09-07-2012, 08:29 PM   #6
Site Supporter
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 27,457
I have a supply of it that I use in my Olympus XA (got it on sale at Target) and for the price you quoted, it is well worth it. Gold 200 is a decent film and scans nicely. Here are a few examples taken with the XA:

I'm So Outta' Here...

Weathered Walls

Yellow and Gassy


BTW...both my Target and my Walgreens still develop and sell film and the techs at both stores report that business is pretty steady. We are sooo deviant here in the Northwest.
09-09-2012, 07:14 AM   #7
Senior Member
fish4570's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: On the Warrior River, Aabama
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 122
my walgreens here in alabama - where two of the techs are very well trained - does a good job. the manager told me that as their machinery is long paid for, he can't imagine his store giving up processing for a long time. he figures 4-5 years minimum.
09-10-2012, 09:42 AM   #8
ChrisPlatt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 4,862
Funny, though I could always find 100 and 400 ISO color negative film I like
I've never been pleased with any brand 200 speed C41 film I have tried...


Last edited by ChrisPlatt; 09-10-2012 at 09:50 AM.
09-10-2012, 05:47 PM   #9
Veteran Member
PPPPPP42's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Photos: Albums
Posts: 847
Original Poster
Very few high end lines of film were made in 200 now that I think about it. Most did tend to jump from 100 to 400, especially now.

Already shot 2 rolls, working on a 3rd. I am working within its ISO limitations but I am totally a 400 ISO guy, I find myself using the A50 1.4 with this stuff a lot more for its extra speed.
09-12-2012, 06:44 AM   #10
Veteran Member
Nesster's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NJ USA
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 13,047
Just for comparison purposes, B&H's film selection from the cheapest...

Roll Film | B&H Photo Video
09-21-2012, 01:29 PM   #11
Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: FL
Posts: 246
Just found it for $4.18/ 3 roll box. I grabbed all four boxes
10-04-2012, 07:07 PM   #12
New Member

Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
I've always found Kodak Gold to be a pretty solid.
edit: picture linking broke

Last edited by Pentigmaron; 10-04-2012 at 09:02 PM.
10-07-2012, 02:01 PM   #13
ChrisPlatt's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Queens NYC
Posts: 4,862
QuoteOriginally posted by Nesster Quote
Note that Kodak Gold 100 is also among the cheapest.


  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
box, film, grain, kodak, kodak gold, stuff, target
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DA40XS Lens Tested on Film (MZ-S + DA40XS on Kodak Gold 200) frank Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 31 03-11-2015 11:22 AM
Want to move on from Kodak Gold Tomzee93 Pentax Film SLR Discussion 24 11-16-2010 10:23 PM
No love for Kodak Gold GeneV Pentax Film SLR Discussion 31 06-14-2010 06:34 AM
A Day with Kodak Gold 100 ajuett Pentax Film SLR Discussion 9 04-08-2009 03:11 PM
Another Kodak Gold 100 ajuett Pentax Film SLR Discussion 2 04-08-2009 09:00 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 AM. | See also:, part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]