I wondered one day why is it so that you people from the WEST like that black finish camera bodies so much..... and WE from ZENIT-zone do not at all.
It is in fact so that black versions of MX, KX, K2, ME Super and so on are much more payed for than chrome-silver ones even though that the wear-out is much less visible on chromed bodies.
Me myself looking for a MX, K2 or finally KX and ME went straight to chrome-silver, never black!!! What reason??????
One simple explanation is this:
By the time of my yought Zenit TTL was the one and ONLY available SLR TTL prosumer camera. 100% of production made in black finish - no choice for you to make..... sad but true....
Old photographers had Practica's from soviet controlled part of Germany (satin-chromed bodies) uncles from USA had Canon's and Pentax'es (chrome-silver bodies) and Newspaper Photographers had Nikons F3, Canon's Pentax'es - mostly chrome-silver bodies.................. except for black F3.
Chromed-silver was cool. Black finish was............ soviet booooooooooooooooooriiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing....
And so it remained. I seek with pleasure for clean chrome KX, looking with huge surprise that worn out black body costs that much more. Good for me!
End of story: tomorrow I go to get my almost perfect not-black KX for no more than 80 bucks.
Last edited by Petrus_One; 01-13-2013 at 01:47 AM.
Reason: Silver - changed to chrome-silver as it should be.