Originally posted by gofour3 It also depends on where the K1000 was made. The early 1976 made in Japan ones fetch the highest prices and the last more plastic made in China ones are worth the least.
There are also made in HK K1000’s and they would be in the middle price wise. The made in China ones are to be avoided.
Phil.
I agree, the best ones are these made from 76 to 78 with the 55mm f2.0.
I paid mine $60 plus shipping, but it's not inmint condition, on the opposite, it's well used, almost surely an ex student camera.
I would pay $90 for one in perfect collection conditions.
---------- Post added 12-05-14 at 03:34 PM ----------
Originally posted by Dangermouse The early HK-made ones are pretty much identical (aside from detail differences such as the serial number location and so on) to the Japanese ones, I have one and it's as solid as my KX/KM bodies. I think it must be one of the first or second batch made in HK judging by the serial and where it fits in the database.
As said above, the only ones many people avoid are those without the AOC logo on. I've never handled a "plastic" K1000 so can't comment.
I think ALL K1000s (including the Chinese ones) are good, simple and reliable cameras, if I had to go for a HK one I'd rather get an SE. main difference is IMO the lens and the weight, the first series (I don't know if they were really built in Japan or already in HK, I know that some SP1000 have an HK sticker) feel heavier and more solid. More metal I assume.