Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version 1 Like Search this Thread
03-12-2016, 08:48 AM   #1
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
The Impossible Dream(?)

Staff note: This post may contain affiliate links, which means Pentax Forums may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. If you would like to support the forum directly, you may also make a donation here.


What screw-mount camera would I buy if I wanted a Spotmatic F (or equivalent capability) the size of an ME? Is there any such beast? Certainly not in the Pentax stable, but perhaps Ricoh or Chinon built one?

03-12-2016, 09:30 AM   #2
Pentaxian
dsmithhfx's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,146
QuoteOriginally posted by pathdoc Quote
the size of an ME?
IIRC only equivalent-size manual bodies to me/mx was the OM1. Not sure if it takes screw mount with adaptor or not.
03-12-2016, 09:37 AM   #3
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,079
Maybe the Chinon CM-3...
03-12-2016, 09:48 AM   #4
Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter




Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Minnesota, USA
Posts: 61
Boy, that goes back a long way. As I remember, back in the 70's, when I bought my ME, it was the smallest SLR available, just a hair smaller than the Olympus OM-1. The ME measured 131 x 82.5 x 49.5 mm (no lens mounted). MX was the same I think. For reference, the Spotmatic F was 143 x 93 x 94 mm with a 50 mm lens mounted.

That said, I hunted around a bit (i.e., googled smallest screw mount SLR) and found the Fujica ST605N, which measures 133 x 86 x 88 mm with 50 mm f/2.2 mounted; the Fujica is quite close in size. The Fujica is 565 g, body only, while the ME is 460 g. The Fujica has a Praktica thread mount, which is the M42 mount screw mount. The MX with a screw mount adaptor would be a manual film SLR smaller than the Spotmatic and slightly smaller than the Fujica.

As a nearly full-service replier, I note that there are a number of the Fujicas available on...an auction site I checked. None of them are mine.

EDIT: dcshooter was first-in with the Fujica. I type too much.

EDIT 2: the Chinon CM-3 is 140.5 x 88 x 50 mm and 610 g.


Last edited by stens; 03-12-2016 at 09:55 AM. Reason: updated for completeness
03-12-2016, 09:58 AM   #5
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,079
Here you go... the ultimate M42 camera
Voigtlander Bessaflex TM
03-12-2016, 10:07 AM   #6
Loyal Site Supporter
Loyal Site Supporter
boriscleto's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: North Syracuse, NY
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 16,475
QuoteOriginally posted by pathdoc Quote
Spotmatic F (or equivalent capability) the size of an ME?
Open aperture metering with SMC Takumar lenses? Spot F and ES are the only ones. SLRs didn't get small until the mid '70s. M series and Olympus OM.
03-12-2016, 11:30 AM - 1 Like   #7
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Swift1 Quote
Here you go... the ultimate M42 camera
Voigtlander Bessaflex TM
Still not as small as a M-series body, but a little smaller than a Spotmatic.* Edit: I take that back! I don't know about height, but the Bessaflex base dimensions are in the same range as the M-series. Hard to find at a reasonable price point though If the OP wants a metered M42 body with small form factor, I would suggest an adapted M-series* or small-bodies Ricoh from the early 1980's. Any K-mount body that supports manual exposure or Av mode should work. Leave the adapter in the body and enjoy!

BTW...I would love to own a Bessaflex TM...in silver please.

Steve

* Same form factor as my Bessa R3M

(Yes, the self-same ME mentioned in the original post should work, though a manual mode camera is a little easier to work with.)


Last edited by stevebrot; 03-12-2016 at 11:48 AM.
03-12-2016, 11:47 AM   #8
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
There are some pretty petite fujica m42 bodies as well.

---------- Post added 03-12-16 at 09:36 AM ----------

Or of course you could just buy the bayonet adapter and use the lenses on the me itself.
Yes, but then I Iose the benefit of the Spotmatic's automatic aperture - if not wide open metering, at least wide open focusing and shooting until the light changes and you have to re-meter (which in circumstances when you can use a thyristor flash is never; set the appropriate f-stop and never have to stop down).
03-12-2016, 11:54 AM   #9
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by pathdoc Quote
Yes, but then I Iose the benefit of the Spotmatic's automatic aperture - if not wide open metering, at least wide open focusing and shooting until the light changes and you have to re-meter (which in circumstances when you can use a thyristor flash is never; set the appropriate f-stop and never have to stop down).
Well then a Fujica or Bessaflex TM would be the most viable options.

EXC Voigtlander Bessa Bessaflex TM SLR Camera M42 Mount Silver Body from Japan 4002451194174 | eBay

Truth be told, I would probably lean towards a Fujica given the price range for the TM. The finish on the Bessaflex is not very robust from what I understand. Up until a few years ago, you could buy a TM NOS out of Singapore, but that stock has dried up.


Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 03-12-2016 at 12:24 PM.
03-12-2016, 11:59 AM   #10
Veteran Member




Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Oregon
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 5,079
QuoteOriginally posted by pathdoc Quote
Yes, but then I Iose the benefit of the Spotmatic's automatic aperture - if not wide open metering, at least wide open focusing and shooting until the light changes and you have to re-meter (which in circumstances when you can use a thyristor flash is never; set the appropriate f-stop and never have to stop down).
If you do away with the meter entirely, the Pentax SV is closer in size to the M series.
03-12-2016, 08:21 PM   #11
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Swift1 Quote
If you do away with the meter entirely, the Pentax SV is closer in size to the M series.
I was thinking the same thing.


Steve
03-13-2016, 03:55 AM   #12
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
Original Poster
I looked in the database here - fractionally smaller only on paper. Maybe it feels better in the hand - I shall keep an eye out for one if I ever see it in the flesh, so to speak, and check out the handling.

Thyristor flash is the great leveller between Spotties and later bodies - no need to stop down to meter; just set the aperture, focus wide-open and go. Even an un-metered Asahi body can compete on level terms.
03-13-2016, 09:04 AM   #13
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
Original Poster
QuoteOriginally posted by dcshooter Quote
I actually have a Fujica ST-705 that I'm not using if you'd be interested. It's just a tad larger than the 605 (133 x 91 x 88mm with standard lens) and only 20g heavier. Relubed and new seals, too. It's not ME petite, but it is a lot closer than your garden variety Spotty.
Sounds interesting. My day is about to get hectic, but I'll get back to you on that one via PM.
03-20-2016, 06:44 PM   #14
dmc
Forum Member




Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Calgary, AB Canada
Posts: 76
Pentax SV. But no meter . . .
03-21-2016, 04:30 AM   #15
Pentaxian




Join Date: Mar 2015
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 6,381
Original Poster
Pentax SV dimensions 140 x 92 x 50mm

Pentax Spotmatic dimensions 143 x 92 x 88mm (with standard lens)

Pentax MX dimensions 136 x 82.5 x 49.5 mm

Pentax ME dimensions 131 x 82.5 x 49.5 mm

The SV is only a little bit narrower than the Spotmatic and just as tall; the ME is almost ten millimetres smaller in both height and breadth (depth is constrained by registry distance etc). So that's not really a solution.
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Impossible lens; Volna 8 50mm 1.2 Mothballs Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 37 06-01-2016 04:51 PM
Canon seeing the impossible... ElJamoquio Canon, Nikon, Sony, and Other Camera Brands 26 10-11-2014 05:33 PM
Fast cheap 28mm lens -- an impossible dream? jon404 Pentax K-01 43 04-05-2013 03:24 PM
Do you guys dream about having a dream lens? lightbulb Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 29 08-25-2012 08:11 AM
Why do you dream about the lenses you dream about? RioRico Pentax SLR Lens Discussion 6 02-02-2012 02:18 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:52 PM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top