Originally posted by Adam I've found the MX's viewfinder to qt times be uncomfortably big. The KX also gives you more to hold on to.
The MX apparent viewing distance is less. This forces you to move your eye about to see all areas of the image.
The KX screen appears slightly further away and is easier to see in a single glance.
The MX exposure LEDs sometimes seem to disappear in bright light and are an advantage only in near-darkness.
The KX analog match-needle and scale exposure display is more intuitive and far easier to see in moderate to bright light.
My major gripe with the MX finder is that semicircular shutter speed display intrudes deep into the screen,
obscuring part of the viewing area, thus making composing more difficult.
Size matters in this case. IMO the MX suffers over-miniaturization. For ergonomics the KX wins hands down.
Chris