Forgot Password
Pentax Camera Forums Home
 

Reply
Show Printable Version Search this Thread
02-21-2020, 12:38 PM   #1
Pentaxian
Jonathan Mac's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Madrid, Spain
Posts: 10,894
DSLR "scanning" using Nikon ES-2 & K-3

Hi everyone,

I wanted to ask if anyone here has any experience using the Nikon ES-2 to "scan" negatives with a DSLR. Particularly if using an APS-C camera, which is what I would have available. I understand it needs a lens with a 62mm filter thread, which would limit me to the Vivitar 55mm f/2.8, but it's a great lens, just not AF. Until now I've used the DA 35mm limited and the AF works well, but I can manage manual focus, especially as (in theory) I wouldn't need to adjust focus from frame to frame.

My big worry is that APS-C will not allow me to get the whole film frame into the shot. For what it is, the ES-2 is extremely expensive (€175 here) but it's a niche item and would simplify things greatly if it works well.

Many thanks for any input anyone can offer.

02-21-2020, 01:13 PM   #2
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
The ES-2 (LINK) is made to work with any of three models of Nikon macro lenses with the lens at minimum focus distance. One of those, the AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 40mm f/2.8 G is preferred for use with APS-C cameras (the other two being FX and presenting a cropped image). To make the ES-2 work, the lens requirements would be:
  • Magnification (1:1.5) to fit the image of the negative to the APS-C frame when fitted natively to the 52mm thread on the ES-2
  • Attaining 1:1.5 magnification when used with either of the two 62mm supplied adapters
I think this may be difficult, though the device does have a bit of play to allow for adjusting framing.

Note: I had to edit significantly as I learned more about the ES-2.


Steve

Last edited by stevebrot; 02-21-2020 at 02:24 PM.
02-21-2020, 02:39 PM   #3
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 11,024
QuoteOriginally posted by stevebrot Quote
The ES-2 (LINK) is made to work with any of three models of Nikon macro lenses with the lens at minimum focus distance.

Steve
I wonder how effective a 20-25mm extension tube would be using a 50mm lens with this slide copier.
02-21-2020, 03:01 PM   #4
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by tuco Quote
I wonder how effective a 20-25mm extension tube would be using a 50mm lens with this slide copier.
That would be hard to say. Matching a 35mm negative to APS-C requires 1:1.5 reproduction ratio and the ES-2 device has a choice of three fixed working distances depending on which lens is used:
AF-S DX Micro NIKKOR 40mm f/2.8 G (native mount to the ES-2)
AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED (in conjunction with included 62mm Adapter A)
AF Micro-NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8D (in conjunction with included 62mm Adapter B)
Based on the instruction manual, it is evident that Nikon intends the DX 40/1.8 for APS-C, though without knowing the working distances for the three supported setups, it would be hard to know in advance what might work for non-Nikon kit.

Link at B&H to ES-2 instruction guide (PDF)


Steve

02-21-2020, 03:59 PM   #5
Pentaxian
photoptimist's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2016
Photos: Albums
Posts: 5,121
QuoteOriginally posted by tuco Quote
I wonder how effective a 20-25mm extension tube would be using a 50mm lens with this slide copier.
That tube length is a little on the short side for most 50s.

In theory, getting to 1:1.5 magnification requires 33mm of extension. The typical 50 (with a MFD of 0.45 meters) has about 7 mm of throw. Thus, the better option might be about 30mm of tube and focusing the lens somewhere in the middle of its range.

The nastier issue is that the average 50 isn't going to be very sharp at 1:1.5 and field curvature could make corner-to-center-to-corner focusing impossible.
02-21-2020, 04:18 PM   #6
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 11,024
QuoteOriginally posted by photoptimist Quote
That tube length is a little on the short side for most 50s.

In theory, getting to 1:1.5 magnification requires 33mm of extension. The typical 50 (with a MFD of 0.45 meters) has about 7 mm of throw. Thus, the better option might be about 30mm of tube and focusing the lens somewhere in the middle of its range.

The nastier issue is that the average 50 isn't going to be very sharp at 1:1.5 and field curvature could make corner-to-center-to-corner focusing impossible.
Yeah, for sure not enough.

I just was checking with some extension tubes I have. I'm able to focus on a 35mm slide and fill my camera's frame good enough using a 56mm ext tube stack up with a 58mm lens. That's close to 1:1 plus whatever magnification from the lens.

Last edited by tuco; 02-21-2020 at 04:33 PM.
02-21-2020, 04:27 PM   #7
Veteran Member
Eyewanders's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Land of the Salish Sea
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,343
For all of these reasons above I abandoned 135 slide-copier setups (after chasing them briefly) for a copy-stand and DIY frame mattes with a diffusion layer atop an LED video light source. A lot more versatile (for me) in the end; switching to medium-format (and various sizes therein) is a breeze.

There's also this awesome 3-d carrier plans. I've been using the 35mm version to great success.
120 & 35mm Film DSLR Film Scanning Holder by bradbrok - Thingiverse

02-21-2020, 04:29 PM - 1 Like   #8
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
It might be helpful if we all knew what the ES-2 looks like so that we might understand that getting to 1:1.5 is only half the issue.


https://nikonrumors.com/2018/08/18/first-look-nikon-es-2-film-digitizing-adapter.aspx/

The standoff (working distance) from the filter threads is essentially fixed to three different distances, though with small margin for adjustment. The video below shows the device in use on a FF D850 60mm macro lens with one of two 62mm thread adapters:


Assembly to the camera starts at about 2min 45sec. It should be pretty clear that there is an additional issue of matching magnification to working distance with whatever lens is used.


Steve
02-21-2020, 06:53 PM - 1 Like   #9
Site Supporter
Site Supporter
pres589's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Wichita, KS
Photos: Albums
Posts: 4,529
For 175e I would think you could get an LED light box with an appropriately diffuse light output (I like the one I got for about $40 USD) and something like the negative holder that Eyewanders suggested. I've been using a Pacific Imaging negative holder meant for one of their scanners and a home-made tray that gives a single frame mask. Honestly the thing Eyewanders suggested is probably better. The only things you have left to collect is maybe a tripod that allows for the camera to be pointed straight at the floor if you want to work that way, and a remote shutter, assuming you don't have either of these already. A 55mm macro lens is probably going to be fine and you have a lot more adjustment available going this route vs. the Nikon negative attachment.


I found this activity was made much easier and faster using the Lightroom plugin from Negative Lab, found here; Negative Lab Pro
02-21-2020, 11:20 PM   #10
Veteran Member
Eyewanders's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Land of the Salish Sea
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 3,343
If any are interested... I've been using (and really happy with) this Raleno LED panel as a source (with a couple layers of duralar for added diffusion sometimes).

I also started using Negative Lab Pro a few months ago. Entirely different workflow that took a lot of getting used to but I've since parted ways with both my 135 scanner and flatbed, so it's worked out well.
02-22-2020, 11:42 AM   #11
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by Eyewanders Quote
For all of these reasons above I abandoned 135 slide-copier setups (after chasing them briefly) for a copy-stand and DIY frame mattes with a diffusion layer atop an LED video light source. A lot more versatile (for me) in the end; switching to medium-format (and various sizes therein) is a breeze.

There's also this awesome 3-d carrier plans. I've been using the 35mm version to great success.
120 & 35mm Film DSLR Film Scanning Holder by bradbrok - Thingiverse
QuoteOriginally posted by Eyewanders Quote
If any are interested... I've been using (and really happy with) this Raleno LED panel as a source (with a couple layers of duralar for added diffusion sometimes).

I also started using Negative Lab Pro a few months ago. Entirely different workflow that took a lot of getting used to but I've since parted ways with both my 135 scanner and flatbed, so it's worked out well.
Is there any chance you might start a new thread with photos of your setup in full and how the pieces fit together? For example, I suspect that not too many people know what a copy stand is.


Steve
02-22-2020, 12:12 PM   #12
Pentaxian




Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pugetopolis
Posts: 11,024
I wonder if a DSLR scanner will be made that comes with its own light source, embedded code, PC software and its own macro lens that will adapt to multiple lens mounts. You use your camera body. Negative to positive conversion features are builtin.

Last edited by tuco; 02-22-2020 at 12:22 PM.
02-22-2020, 02:36 PM   #13
Moderator
Not a Number's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 10,526
See this related thread on the same attachment on a K-1 in crop mode.

You Don't Need A Scanner When You Have A Pentax K-1 - PentaxForums.com
02-22-2020, 03:32 PM   #14
Senior Member
bjolester's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Photos: Gallery
Posts: 211
There is a lot of interesting information about camera scanning, and also the Nikon ES-2 over at rangefinderforum:

Scanning with a digital camera - Rangefinderforum.com
02-22-2020, 03:34 PM   #15
Otis Memorial Pentaxian
stevebrot's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver (USA)
Photos: Gallery | Albums
Posts: 42,007
QuoteOriginally posted by tuco Quote
I wonder if a DSLR scanner will be made that comes with its own light source, embedded code, PC software and its own macro lens that will adapt to multiple lens mounts. You use your camera body. Negative to positive conversion features are builtin.
The closest I have seen to that would have been from a company that retrofitted converted slide projectors to mate certain dSLR cameras.


Steve
Reply

Bookmarks
  • Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook
  • Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter
  • Submit Thread to Digg Digg
Tags - Make this thread easier to find by adding keywords to it!
af, aps-c, dslr, focus, frame, lens, nikon, nikon es-2
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale - Sold: 2 18-55mm kit lenses ("L" and "AL II" version) dgaies Sold Items 5 12-28-2009 07:58 AM
ES vs. ES II Stevopedia Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 24 07-12-2009 05:49 PM
Pentax ES and ES II ads from the 70s Nesster Film SLRs and Compact Film Cameras 6 03-15-2009 06:25 PM



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:22 AM. | See also: NikonForums.com, CanonForums.com part of our network of photo forums!
  • Red (Default)
  • Green
  • Gray
  • Dark
  • Dark Yellow
  • Dark Blue
  • Old Red
  • Old Green
  • Old Gray
  • Dial-Up Style
Hello! It's great to see you back on the forum! Have you considered joining the community?
register
Creating a FREE ACCOUNT takes under a minute, removes ads, and lets you post! [Dismiss]
Top