Originally posted by stevebrot According to the technician that did my CLA, my Ricoh's meter is somewhat out of adjustment and was set to ISO 50 per his suggestion to compensate. A few of the scans looked a little light, so I did a little PP in light room to even out the curve on pictures 1, 2, and 5:
- -2 stop exposure shift on #1, -1.0 on #2, and -0.5 on #5
- +25 brightness
- +10 contrast
As a result, I think I may expose the next roll at ISO 100 and see what it looks like. I will also do a test exposure series using a "7-zone" target, white wash cloth, and black velvet swatch. The results should give some indication of where to set the meter.
Some of the overexposure may also have been the fault of the scanner. I may have to make friends with the technician to see what options are available to optimize the process.
Steve
I just got my first roll of Ektar 100 developed (snapshots from a recent snowstorm, mostly exposed at ASA 80). This stuff is a delight to scan on a Coolscan V: vivid and contrasty with no manual exposure/contrast adjustment at all.
Skin tones are not so great; light-skinned people generally turn out a bit too pink.
I don't think I'd use it as a general-purpose travel film. But for scenery it's quite nice.