:cool: Lets see those ''film'' shots

jgredline · 06-22-2009, 08:36 PM

Originally posted by Peter Zack

Geez Javier, that stuff might just make me get the PZ-1p out for the low light church shots. Looks better than my K20D at 1600.

Thanks Peter.
I was really impressed with the results of this combo I used. I had never used any 1600 film before let alone in the middle of the night. I shot the roll between 10:30 and Midnight. I had my twins out late, poor things. My wife also was having a blast shooting film. Here is a picture of the rig I used.
ME SUPER, M50F/1.4 and the Fuji Superia 1600. I was also using a tripod and cable release.

Here are afew more ASA 1600 shots.

and a lighthouse for u 8-)

SteveM · 06-22-2009, 09:44 PM

Originally posted by Jake67

Wow.......

Venturi · 06-22-2009, 10:28 PM

Originally posted by smc

Wow.......

Yeah. I know.

photolady95 · 06-22-2009, 11:08 PM

MZ-5n, T-max 400. F100-300mm (don't remember f stop)

This one is hanging in a state park near where the falls are.

Nesster · 06-23-2009, 06:00 AM

Kodak Ultramax, Nikon FE, Nikkor E 1.8/50mm, Hoboken NJ

BernardMarx · 06-23-2009, 06:42 AM

Camera: Pentax ES
Lens: SMC Takumar 50mm 1.4
Film: Fuji Reala
Scanned negative using HP ScanJet 8300
The BW was obviously converted in post.

jgredline · 06-23-2009, 07:01 AM

Nesster, Beautiful picture with great color and the detail is great!

**Douglas_of_Sweden** · 06-23-2009, 07:40 AM

Fujicolor in a KX with the SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 on it used on a trip to a nearby lake and forest with the kids a while ago (April, you can still see some ice on the northern side of the lake).
I need not explain that I was quite upset with the 8 years old when she throw sand at me and the KX in the last picture, but having seen the result I have forgiven her

Nesster · 06-23-2009, 07:56 AM

Originally posted by jgredline

Nesster, Beautiful picture with great color and the detail is great!

Yeah, I'm a bit scared, I've noted the quality of the Nikkor E 50 before... and my brother in law's Canons as well. Guess it is a slightly different look than with the Pentaxes.

jgredline · 06-23-2009, 08:34 AM

Originally posted by Nesster

Yeah, I'm a bit scared, I've noted the quality of the Nikkor E 50 before... and my brother in law's Canons as well. Guess it is a slightly different look than with the Pentaxes.

I know what you mean. I have thought the same about my Canon FD lenses. For some reason the detail and color is noticeably different. I also think this is why so many are hooked on to the takumars. They too put out that great color and detail.

Blue · 06-23-2009, 11:06 AM

Originally posted by jgredline

I know what you mean. I have thought the same about my Canon FD lenses. For some reason the detail and color is noticeably different. I also think this is why so many are hooked on to the takumars. They too put out that great color and detail.

I'm not hooked on my Taks. I plan on getting rid of them. It is addressed in my will.

MC25 · 06-23-2009, 05:51 PM

Jake, that last one is really cute.

Venturi · 06-23-2009, 07:40 PM

Originally posted by Blue

I'm not hooked on my Taks. I plan on getting rid of them. It is addressed in my will.

That is what's called a "pearl".

Venturi · 06-23-2009, 07:52 PM

Well, I gotta say shooting color film is a whole new ballgame for me. Other than a roll of Gold200 I burned up to test my PZ-1 when I got it last fall I had not shot color film since 1995.
Not being one to go into anything half way the following images are from:
- my 1st rolls of Portra 400VC ever,
- first color since '95,
- first roll of color I processed myself,
- and first roll of color film I have scanned.

Out of all those the last was the killer. For the record - Canoscan software SUCKS unless you really really like blue/purple images. But VueScan and a bit of trial and error over the past couple days gave me these. Not the best, but not bad IMO for a 4-way first time out.

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_01.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Canna is getting big.

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_03.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
A wee nymph on a soon to be daylily (approx. 1:1.3 macro)

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_04.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Yesterday Lily

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_07.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Requisite photo of Nate.

(Post #900 in this thread! WOW!)

jgredline · 06-23-2009, 08:15 PM

Originally posted by Venturi

Well, I gotta say shooting color film is a whole new ballgame for me. Other than a roll of Gold200 I burned up to test my PZ-1 when I got it last fall I had not shot color film since 1995.
Not being one to go into anything half way the following images are from:
- my 1st rolls of Portra 400VC ever,
- first color since '95,
- first roll of color I processed myself,
- and first roll of color film I have scanned.

Out of all those the last was the killer. For the record - Canoscan software SUCKS unless you really really like blue/purple images. But VueScan and a bit of trial and error over the past couple days gave me these. Not the best, but not bad IMO for a 4-way first time out.

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_01.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Canna is getting big.

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_03.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
A wee nymph on a soon to be daylily (approx. 1:1.3 macro)

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_04.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Yesterday Lily

[IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_07.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT]
Requisite photo of Nate.

(Post #900 in this thread! WOW!)

I am impressed. Bravo!

06-23-2009, 06:42 AM	#891
BernardMarx Inactive Account Join Date: Jun 2009 Photos: Gallery Posts: 22	From my second (ever) roll of film: Camera: Pentax ES Lens: SMC Takumar 50mm 1.4 Film: Fuji Reala Scanned negative using HP ScanJet 8300 The BW was obviously converted in post. Last edited by BernardMarx; 06-23-2009 at 09:22 AM.

06-23-2009, 07:40 AM	#893
Douglas_of_Sweden Site Supporter Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Stockholm Photos: Gallery Posts: 3,374	Fujicolor in a KX with the SMC Pentax 28mm f3.5 on it used on a trip to a nearby lake and forest with the kids a while ago (April, you can still see some ice on the northern side of the lake). I need not explain that I was quite upset with the 8 years old when she throw sand at me and the KX in the last picture, but having seen the result I have forgiven her Last edited by Douglas_of_Sweden; 06-24-2009 at 01:16 AM. Reason: bad phrasing

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
K20D test shots at Lets Go Digital	schufosi777	Pentax News and Rumors	6	04-20-2013 11:31 AM
Macro Cool Macro shots	derajjjg	Post Your Photos!	2	12-27-2009 09:36 PM
Lets see your Moon and Mars shots	Igilligan	Post Your Photos!	9	12-05-2009 08:55 AM
Way cool bat shots	and	General Talk	7	10-01-2009 02:54 AM
Cool Shots & Info	Fl_Gulfer	Post Your Photos!	0	12-10-2007 11:44 AM

06-22-2009, 08:36 PM	#886
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by Peter Zack Geez Javier, that stuff might just make me get the PZ-1p out for the low light church shots. Looks better than my K20D at 1600. Thanks Peter. I was really impressed with the results of this combo I used. I had never used any 1600 film before let alone in the middle of the night. I shot the roll between 10:30 and Midnight. I had my twins out late, poor things. My wife also was having a blast shooting film. Here is a picture of the rig I used. ME SUPER, M50F/1.4 and the Fuji Superia 1600. I was also using a tripod and cable release. Here are afew more ASA 1600 shots. and a lighthouse for u 8-)

06-22-2009, 09:44 PM	#887
SteveM Veteran Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Vancouver Island, BC, Canada Photos: Gallery Posts: 3,294	Originally posted by Jake67 Wow.......

06-22-2009, 10:28 PM	#888
Venturi Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Tulsa, OK Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,636	Originally posted by smc Wow....... Yeah. I know.

06-22-2009, 11:08 PM	#889
photolady95 Otis Memorial Pentaxian Join Date: May 2009 Location: Cruising the forum watching his back Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 12,712	MZ-5n, T-max 400. F100-300mm (don't remember f stop) This one is hanging in a state park near where the falls are.

06-23-2009, 06:00 AM	#890
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	Kodak Ultramax, Nikon FE, Nikkor E 1.8/50mm, Hoboken NJ

06-23-2009, 07:01 AM	#892
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Nesster, Beautiful picture with great color and the detail is great!

06-23-2009, 07:56 AM	#894
Nesster Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: NJ USA Photos: Gallery Posts: 13,072	Originally posted by jgredline Nesster, Beautiful picture with great color and the detail is great! Yeah, I'm a bit scared, I've noted the quality of the Nikkor E 50 before... and my brother in law's Canons as well. Guess it is a slightly different look than with the Pentaxes.

06-23-2009, 08:34 AM	#895
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by Nesster Yeah, I'm a bit scared, I've noted the quality of the Nikkor E 50 before... and my brother in law's Canons as well. Guess it is a slightly different look than with the Pentaxes. I know what you mean. I have thought the same about my Canon FD lenses. For some reason the detail and color is noticeably different. I also think this is why so many are hooked on to the takumars. They too put out that great color and detail.

06-23-2009, 11:06 AM	#896
Blue Moderator Site Supporter Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Florida Hill Country Photos: Gallery \| Albums Posts: 17,377	Originally posted by jgredline I know what you mean. I have thought the same about my Canon FD lenses. For some reason the detail and color is noticeably different. I also think this is why so many are hooked on to the takumars. They too put out that great color and detail. I'm not hooked on my Taks. I plan on getting rid of them. It is addressed in my will.

06-23-2009, 05:51 PM	#897
MC25 Inactive Account Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Canada Photos: Gallery Posts: 73	Jake, that last one is really cute.

06-23-2009, 07:40 PM	#898
Venturi Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Tulsa, OK Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,636	Originally posted by Blue I'm not hooked on my Taks. I plan on getting rid of them. It is addressed in my will. That is what's called a "pearl".

06-23-2009, 07:52 PM	#899
Venturi Veteran Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Tulsa, OK Photos: Gallery Posts: 2,636	Well, I gotta say shooting color film is a whole new ballgame for me. Other than a roll of Gold200 I burned up to test my PZ-1 when I got it last fall I had not shot color film since 1995. Not being one to go into anything half way the following images are from: - my 1st rolls of Portra 400VC ever, - first color since '95, - first roll of color I processed myself, - and first roll of color film I have scanned. Out of all those the last was the killer. For the record - Canoscan software SUCKS unless you really really like blue/purple images. But VueScan and a bit of trial and error over the past couple days gave me these. Not the best, but not bad IMO for a 4-way first time out. [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_01.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Canna is getting big. [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_03.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] A wee nymph on a soon to be daylily (approx. 1:1.3 macro) [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_04.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Yesterday Lily [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_07.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Requisite photo of Nate. (Post #900 in this thread! WOW!)

06-23-2009, 08:15 PM	#900
jgredline Veteran Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: LosAngeles, Ca. Photos: Albums Posts: 10,628 Original Poster	Originally posted by Venturi Well, I gotta say shooting color film is a whole new ballgame for me. Other than a roll of Gold200 I burned up to test my PZ-1 when I got it last fall I had not shot color film since 1995. Not being one to go into anything half way the following images are from: - my 1st rolls of Portra 400VC ever, - first color since '95, - first roll of color I processed myself, - and first roll of color film I have scanned. Out of all those the last was the killer. For the record - Canoscan software SUCKS unless you really really like blue/purple images. But VueScan and a bit of trial and error over the past couple days gave me these. Not the best, but not bad IMO for a 4-way first time out. [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_01.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Canna is getting big. [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_03.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] A wee nymph on a soon to be daylily (approx. 1:1.3 macro) [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_04.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Yesterday Lily [IMGWIDELEFT]http://www.perzactly.com/posts/2009/06/23/portra400vc_07.jpg[/IMGWIDELEFT] Requisite photo of Nate. (Post #900 in this thread! WOW!) I am impressed. Bravo!