Originally posted by dsmithhfx Back in the day I used to shoot Seattle Film Works' [some kind of eastman] film stock. I really liked the slides, but the neg's I fiind difficult to color-correct because they are so different from the consumer c41 stuff my workflow is geared for.
Both my father and I shot quite a bit of Seattle Film Works as well for a number of years. Yes, very similar to the Cinestill though they've gone a step further finding a way remove the remjet backing before processing so that you can dev their stuff in any old C41 chem.
Quote: Is the Pakon a recent acquisition? ISTR you posting a query about film scanners a little while ago.
I may have posted a question about repair or sale of my first F135 in the past 6 months or so... not sure.
I've had two Pakons F135 variants, currently the older/slower/cheaper variety "non-Plus". The "Plus" version that scanned this shot I bought a couple years back or just shy of that. It developed a problem with the LED assembly and I sold it a couple months ago. I wasn't going to get another but the original seller offered me half price on the "non-Plus" model they had (it is quite a bit slower but still easy as pie to use) about 2 months after I'd sent a short belly-aching email about the Plus dying after under a year of limited use. Very difficult and expensive to service and the price of them keeps rising to crazy levels - also somewhat of a pain to setup (only runs under WinXP) but once you have it's a breeze.
I still occasionally scan single frames on my flatbed or have my lab do it very occasionally for an image I really like, but for simple everyday web-sized posting, the Pakon is more than sufficient, and more importantly nearly handsoff easy. I thought of them as a super-duper proof set, but really I use it for far more than that at this point.